Bug 1378294 – crushtool --compile: error out as long as parse fails

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.

Bug 1378294 - crushtool --compile: error out as long as parse fails

Summary:	crushtool --compile: error out as long as parse fails

Status:	CLOSED ERRATA

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification:	Red Hat
Component:	RADOS (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	2.0
Hardware:	Unspecified Unspecified

Priority	low Severity low
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	2.3
Assigned To:	Brad Hubbard
QA Contact:	vidushi
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2016-09-21 23:54 EDT by Brad Hubbard
Modified:	2017-07-30 11:08 EDT (History)
CC List:	9 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:	RHEL: ceph-10.2.7-2.el7cp Ubuntu: ceph_10.2.7-3redhat1xenial
Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	1378292
Environment:
Last Closed:	2017-06-19 09:26:58 EDT
Type:	Bug
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

External Trackers
Tracker	ID	Priority	Status	Summary	Last Updated
Ceph Project Bug Tracker	17306	None	None	None	2016-09-22 01:12 EDT
Red Hat Product Errata	RHBA-2017:1497	normal	SHIPPED_LIVE	Red Hat Ceph Storage 2.3 bug fix and enhancement update	2017-06-19 13:24:11 EDT

Groups: None (edit)

Comment 4 Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) 2017-01-24 22:01:57 EST

Was there a problem with the upstream PR to jewel? https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11410

Comment 5 Brad Hubbard 2017-01-24 22:11:21 EST

(In reply to Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) from comment #4)
> Was there a problem with the upstream PR to jewel?
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11410

Looking into that. I believe we had a discussion about the upstream backport not being critical?

Comment 6 Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) 2017-01-24 22:16:21 EST

Sounds like this should be re-targeted to 2.3 in that case?

Comment 7 Brad Hubbard 2017-01-24 22:40:55 EST

Sure, np.

Comment 11 Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) 2017-03-31 18:13:52 EDT

We'll take this as part of the rebase to v10.2.7.

Comment 17 errata-xmlrpc 2017-06-19 09:26:58 EDT

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:1497

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.