Bug 1378662 - [Doc RFE] document PV selector instructions in the Deployment Guide
Summary: [Doc RFE] document PV selector instructions in the Deployment Guide
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Documentation
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: CNS 3.3
Assignee: Divya
QA Contact: Anoop
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1378925 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 1371471
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-09-23 02:48 UTC by Anjana Suparna Sriram
Modified: 2016-10-14 13:54 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-10-14 13:54:49 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
divya: needinfo-


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Anjana Suparna Sriram 2016-09-23 02:48:42 UTC
Document URL: 

Section Number and Name: 

Describe the issue: 

Suggestions for improvement: 

Additional information:

Comment 2 Michael Adam 2016-09-23 14:18:46 UTC
*** Bug 1378925 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 Erin Boyd 2016-09-29 20:00:21 UTC
Comments have been made directly in the document:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CDb35N7N_qIW98ga9967QnCDHTE_dHhKTrNn0CWEJzk/edit?ts=57e38508

Comment 7 Divya 2016-10-03 08:21:25 UTC
Incorporated the feedback provided in the google doc.

Link to the doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CDb35N7N_qIW98ga9967QnCDHTE_dHhKTrNn0CWEJzk/edit#heading=h.nchgt5bq8k3j

Moving the bug to ON_QA.

Comment 8 Erin Boyd 2016-10-03 17:02:59 UTC
Is QE/QA going to validate this, or just my team?

Comment 9 Rejy M Cyriac 2016-10-03 17:12:02 UTC
(In reply to Erin Boyd from comment #8)
> Is QE/QA going to validate this, or just my team?

The accepted Bugzilla work-flow requires Doc BZs at ON_QA to be verified by the corresponding QE team

The User Acceptance Testing is in addition to this, and successful UAT validation may be marked at a comment on the BZ

Comment 10 Erin Boyd 2016-10-03 17:12:27 UTC
Verifed by UAT

Comment 11 Prasanth 2016-10-04 09:52:15 UTC
(In reply to Divya from comment #7)
> Incorporated the feedback provided in the google doc.
> 
> Link to the doc:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/
> 1CDb35N7N_qIW98ga9967QnCDHTE_dHhKTrNn0CWEJzk/edit#heading=h.nchgt5bq8k3j
> 
> Moving the bug to ON_QA.

Verified in the above google doc.

Divya, can you also provide the link to the staging doc?

Comment 12 Divya 2016-10-04 10:33:22 UTC
(In reply to Prasanth from comment #11)
> (In reply to Divya from comment #7)
> > Incorporated the feedback provided in the google doc.
> > 
> > Link to the doc:
> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/
> > 1CDb35N7N_qIW98ga9967QnCDHTE_dHhKTrNn0CWEJzk/edit#heading=h.nchgt5bq8k3j
> > 
> > Moving the bug to ON_QA.
> 
> Verified in the above google doc.
> 
> Divya, can you also provide the link to the staging doc?

Prasanth,

Link to the staging doc: https://doc-stage.usersys.redhat.com/documentation/en/red-hat-gluster-storage/3.1/single/red-hat-gluster-storage-container-native-with-openshift-platform#chap-Documentation-Red_Hat_Gluster_Storage_Container_Native_with_OpenShift_Platform-OpenShift_Creating_Persistent_Volumes


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.