Bug 1379264 - RHEVH 3.6 7.3 should be with the latest rhel 7.3 beta snapshot 5
Summary: RHEVH 3.6 7.3 should be with the latest rhel 7.3 beta snapshot 5
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager
Classification: Red Hat
Component: rhev-hypervisor-ng
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: ovirt-3.6.10
: ---
Assignee: Joey Boggs
QA Contact: Yihui Zhao
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-09-26 08:57 UTC by jianwu
Modified: 2017-01-23 14:24 UTC (History)
19 users (show)

Fixed In Version: rhev-hypervisor7-7.3-20161007.0
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-01-23 14:24:29 UTC
oVirt Team: Node
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHEA-2017:0181 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE rhev-hypervisor bug fix and enhancement update for RHEV 3.6.10 2017-01-24 13:54:28 UTC

Description jianwu 2016-09-26 08:57:18 UTC 
Description of problem:
rhevh 7.3 should be with the latest rhel 7.3 beta snapshot 5,the kernel version and libvirt version are not with rhel 7.3 beta snapshot 5.

kernel-3.10.0-506.el7.x86_64
libvirt-2.0.0-9.el7.x86_64


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
RHEV-H 7.3-20160923.2.el7ev


How reproducible:
100%


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install RHEV-H 7.3-20160923.2.el7ev
2. rpm -qa |grep kernel
3. rpm -qa |grep libvirt

Actual results:
The kernel and libvirt version on RHEVH 7.3-3.6.10
kernel-3.10.0-506.el7.x86_64
libvirt-2.0.0-9.el7.x86_64
The kernel and libvirt version in errata don't match to.


Expected results:
rhevh 7.3 should be with the latest rhel 7.3 beta snapshot 5



Additional info:
snapshot 5 released Sep 22
Comment 1 Red Hat Bugzilla Rules Engine 2016-09-26 08:57:30 UTC 
Bug tickets must have version flags set prior to targeting them to a release. Please ask maintainer to set the correct version flags and only then set the target milestone.
Comment 2 Red Hat Bugzilla Rules Engine 2016-09-26 08:57:30 UTC 
Target release should be placed once a package build is known to fix a issue. Since this bug is not modified, the target version has been reset. Please use target milestone to plan a fix for a oVirt release.
Comment 7 Yihui Zhao 2016-10-13 05:43:02 UTC 
Hi all,
    the bug is not exist on RHVH4.0.0-20161007.

The packages if possible:
qemu-kvm-rhev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.21.x86_64
kernel-3.10.0-512.el7.x86_64
rhvh-4.0-0.20161007.0+1

Thanks,
Yihui
Comment 8 Yihui Zhao 2016-10-13 06:24:51 UTC 
(In reply to Yihui Zhao from comment #7)
> Hi all,
>     the bug is not exist on RHVH4.0.0-20161007.
> 
> The packages if possible:
> qemu-kvm-rhev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.21.x86_64
> kernel-3.10.0-512.el7.x86_64
> rhvh-4.0-0.20161007.0+1
> 
> Thanks,
> Yihui

Sorry,ingore the comment 7.
and the correct comment is here:
 
The bug is not exist on RHEV-H 7.3-20161007.0.el7ev.
Comment 9 Douglas Schilling Landgraf 2016-10-13 19:46:56 UTC 
(In reply to Yihui Zhao from comment #8)
> (In reply to Yihui Zhao from comment #7)
> > Hi all,
> >     the bug is not exist on RHVH4.0.0-20161007.
> > 
> > The packages if possible:
> > qemu-kvm-rhev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.21.x86_64
> > kernel-3.10.0-512.el7.x86_64
> > rhvh-4.0-0.20161007.0+1
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Yihui
> 
> Sorry,ingore the comment 7.
> and the correct comment is here:
>  
> The bug is not exist on RHEV-H 7.3-20161007.0.el7ev.

If it's all set, could we move the bug to VERIFIED? 

Thanks!
Comment 10 Yihui Zhao 2016-10-14 01:39:47 UTC 
(In reply to Douglas Schilling Landgraf from comment #9)
> (In reply to Yihui Zhao from comment #8)
> > (In reply to Yihui Zhao from comment #7)
> > > Hi all,
> > >     the bug is not exist on RHVH4.0.0-20161007.
> > > 
> > > The packages if possible:
> > > qemu-kvm-rhev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.21.x86_64
> > > kernel-3.10.0-512.el7.x86_64
> > > rhvh-4.0-0.20161007.0+1
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Yihui
> > 
> > Sorry,ingore the comment 7.
> > and the correct comment is here:
> >  
> > The bug is not exist on RHEV-H 7.3-20161007.0.el7ev.
> 
> If it's all set, could we move the bug to VERIFIED? 
> 
> Thanks!

Yes,OK.
Comment 11 Huijuan Zhao 2016-10-14 05:47:56 UTC 
According to comment 8, we will set the status to VERIFIED after the status changes to ON_QA.
Thanks!
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.