Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

For bugs related to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 product line. The current stable release is 3.9. For Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and above, please visit Red Hat JIRA https://issues.redhat.com/secure/CreateIssue!default.jspa?pid=12332745 to report new issues.

Bug 137973

Summary:	tetex-latex package missing latex2html
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3	Reporter:	Timothy E Miller <drstitch>
Component:	tetex	Assignee:	Jindrich Novy <jnovy>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	David Lawrence <dkl>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	3.0	CC:	pknirsch
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2005-04-01 14:39:23 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Timothy E Miller 2004-11-03 15:13:03 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.4.3)
Gecko/20040924

Description of problem:
The tetex-latex package for 3AS/x86_64 is missing the latex2html perl
script.  The script is in the 3AS/i386 RPM.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
1.0.7-66

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. On 3AS/i686: rpm -ql tetex-latex shows /usr/bin/latex2html
2. On 3AS/x86_64: rpm -ql tetex-latex does not show /usr/bin/latex2html


Additional info:

Comment 1 Jindrich Novy 2004-11-03 19:07:47 UTC

Timothy,

the problem is in the spec file, where build of latex2html is enabled
only for i386 family machines. I'll check it and if it's no problem
with it I'll enable it also for x86_64.

greetings,
Jindrich

Comment 2 Jindrich Novy 2005-01-06 13:06:01 UTC

I added the latex2html to tetex-latex package for 64bit platforms.
This bug will be closed automatically when the erratum is released.

Comment 3 Josh Bressers 2005-04-01 14:39:23 UTC

An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-354.html