Description: JapaneseCharacterCONVerter - inter-convert hiragana, katakana, half-width kana. Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15871370 Issues: no known issues, but some false positives about spelling from rpmlint. FAS-User: besser82 Urls: Spec URL: https://besser82.fedorapeople.org/review/python-jcconv.spec SRPM URL: https://besser82.fedorapeople.org/review/python-jcconv-0.2.3-0.1.fc26.src.rpm Thanks for review in advance!
Updated package: Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15872194 Urls: Spec URL: https://besser82.fedorapeople.org/review/python-jcconv.spec SRPM URL: https://besser82.fedorapeople.org/review/python-jcconv-0.2.3-0.2.fc26.src.rpm
taken
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated". 6 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/mukundan/ownCloud/misc_pkgs/pkg_reviews/1380671-python- jcconv/licensecheck.txt ---> Missing license already mentioned to upstream as per changelog. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 4 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python2-jcconv , python3-jcconv [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: python2-jcconv-0.2.3-0.2.fc26.noarch.rpm python3-jcconv-0.2.3-0.2.fc26.noarch.rpm python-jcconv-0.2.3-0.2.fc26.src.rpm python2-jcconv.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hiragana -> Hinayana python2-jcconv.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US katakana -> Katina python2-jcconv.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US kana -> Sana, Lana, Dana python3-jcconv.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hiragana -> Hinayana python3-jcconv.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US katakana -> Katina python3-jcconv.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US kana -> Sana, Lana, Dana python-jcconv.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hiragana -> Hinayana python-jcconv.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US katakana -> Katina python-jcconv.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US kana -> Sana, Lana, Dana 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- python2-jcconv.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hiragana -> Hinayana python2-jcconv.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US katakana -> Katina python2-jcconv.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US kana -> Sana, Lana, Dana python3-jcconv.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hiragana -> Hinayana python3-jcconv.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US katakana -> Katina python3-jcconv.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US kana -> Sana, Lana, Dana 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. ---> rpmlint messages are non-issues. Requires -------- python2-jcconv (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python(abi) python2-six python3-jcconv (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python(abi) python3-six Provides -------- python2-jcconv: python-jcconv python2-jcconv python2.7dist(jcconv) python2dist(jcconv) python3-jcconv: python3-jcconv python3.5dist(jcconv) python3dist(jcconv) Source checksums ---------------- https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/j/jcconv/jcconv-0.2.3.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : e3bd59d3fb129b952f84c66e6187abddb88cc7c2b3c83b12685a3256fd3b5e54 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : e3bd59d3fb129b952f84c66e6187abddb88cc7c2b3c83b12685a3256fd3b5e54 Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1380671 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6
Nothing to complain here. Package APPROVED.
Thank you for the review! =)
Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-jcconv
python-jcconv-0.2.4-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-5b597e47b6
python-jcconv-0.2.4-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-ba72dcc8eb
python-jcconv-0.2.4-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
python-jcconv-0.2.4-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.