Bug 1383445 - Review Request: python-requests_ntlm - HTTP NTLM authentication using the requests library
Summary: Review Request: python-requests_ntlm - HTTP NTLM authentication using the req...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Kevin Fenzi
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1383434
Blocks: 1383447
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-10-10 15:51 UTC by James Hogarth
Modified: 2016-12-20 10:13 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-12-20 10:13:32 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
kevin: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description James Hogarth 2016-10-10 15:51:32 UTC
Spec URL: https://jhogarth.fedorapeople.org/python-requests_ntlm/python-requests_ntlm.spec
SRPM URL: https://jhogarth.fedorapeople.org/python-requests_ntlm/python-requests_ntlm-0.3.0-1.fc25.src.rpm

Description: This package allows for HTTP NTLM authentication using the requests library.

Fedora Account System Username: jhogarth

Comment 1 Kevin Fenzi 2016-10-13 03:21:49 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
* Package installs properly.
  Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
  See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines

(ignore, it's just because it cannot file python{23}-ntlm

I don't see any issues here, so this package is APPROVED.

===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated". 10 files have unknown license. Detailed
     output of licensecheck in /home/fedora/kevin/1383445-python-
     requests_ntlm/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
     that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
     process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
     python2-requests_ntlm , python3-requests_ntlm
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: Mock build failed
     See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#rpmlint
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Installation errors
-------------------
INFO: mock.py version 1.2.21 starting (python version = 3.5.2)...
Start: init plugins
INFO: selinux enabled
Finish: init plugins
Start: run
Start: chroot init
INFO: calling preinit hooks
INFO: enabled root cache
INFO: enabled dnf cache
Start: cleaning dnf metadata
Finish: cleaning dnf metadata
Mock Version: 1.2.21
INFO: Mock Version: 1.2.21
Finish: chroot init
INFO: installing package(s): /home/fedora/kevin/1383445-python-requests_ntlm/results/python2-requests_ntlm-0.3.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm /home/fedora/kevin/1383445-python-requests_ntlm/results/python3-requests_ntlm-0.3.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm
ERROR: Command failed. See logs for output.
 # /usr/bin/dnf --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ --releasever 26 --disableplugin=local --setopt=deltarpm=false install /home/fedora/kevin/1383445-python-requests_ntlm/results/python2-requests_ntlm-0.3.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm /home/fedora/kevin/1383445-python-requests_ntlm/results/python3-requests_ntlm-0.3.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: python2-requests_ntlm-0.3.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm
          python3-requests_ntlm-0.3.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm
          python-requests_ntlm-0.3.0-1.fc26.src.rpm
python2-requests_ntlm.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/python2-requests_ntlm/CONTRIBUTORS.rst
python3-requests_ntlm.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/python3-requests_ntlm/CONTRIBUTORS.rst
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.




Requires
--------
python2-requests_ntlm (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    python(abi)
    python2-ntlm3

python3-requests_ntlm (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    python(abi)
    python3-ntlm3



Provides
--------
python2-requests_ntlm:
    python-requests_ntlm
    python2-requests_ntlm
    python2.7dist(requests-ntlm)
    python2dist(requests-ntlm)

python3-requests_ntlm:
    python3-requests_ntlm
    python3.5dist(requests-ntlm)
    python3dist(requests-ntlm)



Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/requests/requests-ntlm/archive/0.3.0.tar.gz#/requests-ntlm-0.3.0.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 6798d5db61241b083be7019d22142c476625a2048666cc1ab134246c075c4552
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 6798d5db61241b083be7019d22142c476625a2048666cc1ab134246c075c4552


Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1383445
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP
Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6

Comment 2 Gwyn Ciesla 2016-10-13 12:36:59 UTC
Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-requests_ntlm

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2016-10-19 18:55:06 UTC
python-requests_ntlm-0.3.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a9fdec7773

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2016-10-19 19:56:00 UTC
python-requests_ntlm-0.3.0-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-ece513d041

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2016-10-20 09:27:20 UTC
python-requests_ntlm-0.3.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-da704823d7

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2016-10-25 04:27:30 UTC
python-requests_ntlm-0.3.0-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2016-10-27 06:49:39 UTC
python-requests_ntlm-0.3.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-cfd7f83ae9

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2016-10-28 18:50:02 UTC
python-requests_ntlm-0.3.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2016-10-28 19:51:20 UTC
python-requests_ntlm-0.3.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2016-11-19 12:48:27 UTC
python-requests_ntlm-0.3.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.