Bug 1383474 - Review Request: perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian - Julian Calendar support for DateTime.pm
Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian - Julian Calendar support for D...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Neal Gompa
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-10-10 18:01 UTC by Tom "spot" Callaway
Modified: 2016-10-24 23:51 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-10-20 16:25:10 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
ngompa13: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Tom "spot" Callaway 2016-10-10 18:01:37 UTC
Spec URL: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian.spec
SRPM URL: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian-0.04-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: DateTime object in the Julian calendar.
Fedora Account System Username: spot

Comment 1 Tom "spot" Callaway 2016-10-10 18:15:15 UTC
Koji Rawhide scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16032959

Comment 2 Tom "spot" Callaway 2016-10-10 18:28:46 UTC
Since it is no longer 2005, I have removed the rm -rf %{buildroot} line from %install.

Spec URL: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian.spec
SRPM URL: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian-0.04-2.fc24.src.rpm

Comment 3 Neal Gompa 2016-10-10 19:04:31 UTC
Taking the review...

Comment 4 Neal Gompa 2016-10-10 19:09:08 UTC
Something I noticed right off the bat: perl-generators is missing as a BuildRequires. perl-generators is no longer in the buildroot by default, so dependencies will not be generated automatically.

Comment 6 Neal Gompa 2016-10-10 20:03:09 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated



===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "Perl". 7 files have unknown license.
     Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/makerpm/1383474-perl-
     DateTime-Calendar-Julian/licensecheck.txt
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
     must be documented in the spec.
[!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
     Note: Dirs in package are owned also by:
     /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/DateTime(perl-DateTime-Format-IBeat,
     perl-DateTime-Format-DB2, perl-DateTime-Format-Builder, perl-DateTime-
     Event-Recurrence, perl-DateTime-Format-Pg, perl-DateTime-Format-ICal,
     perl-DateTime-TimeZone-SystemV, perl-DateTime-Tiny, perl-DateTime-
     Format-Duration, perl-DateTime-Precise, perl-DateTime-Format-
     DateManip, perl-DateTime-Format-Natural, perl-DateTime-Calendar-Mayan,
     perl-DateTime-TimeZone, perl-DateTime-Format-MySQL, perl-DateTime-
     Format-Excel, perl-DateTime-Format-Oracle, perl-DateTime-Set, perl-
     DateTime-Event-ICal, perl-DateTime-Locale, perl-DateTime-Format-
     DateParse, perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible, perl-DateTime-Incomplete,
     perl-DateTime-TimeZone-Tzfile, perl-DateTime-Format-Epoch, perl-
     DateTime-Format-HTTP, perl-DateTime-Format-W3CDTF, perl-DateTime-
     Format-ISO8601, perl-DateTime-Format-SQLite, perl-DateTime-Format-XSD,
     perl-DateTime-Format-Mail, perl-DateTime-Format-Atom, perl-DateTime-
     Format-Strptime, perl-DateTime-Format-DBI, perl-DateTime-Format-
     RFC3339), /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/DateTime/Calendar(perl-
     DateTime-Calendar-Mayan)
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
     that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Perl:
[x]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires and Requires:.
[x]: CPAN urls should be non-versioned.

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro.
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian-0.04-3.fc26.noarch.rpm
          perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian-0.04-3.fc26.src.rpm
perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian/LICENSE
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian/LICENSE
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.



Requires
--------
perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.0)
    perl(DateTime)
    perl(strict)
    perl(vars)



Provides
--------
perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian:
    perl(DateTime::Calendar::Julian)
    perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian



Source checksums
----------------
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/P/PI/PIJLL/DateTime-Calendar-Julian-0.04.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : bb5968ad18bcd0772d2c311cd2deb23b777475ea05aa1099688247cd27a5000e
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : bb5968ad18bcd0772d2c311cd2deb23b777475ea05aa1099688247cd27a5000e


Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1383474 --mock-config fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, Perl
Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Haskell, R, PHP
Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6

Comment 7 Neal Gompa 2016-10-10 20:05:05 UTC
Is the file/folder ownership conflict intentional?

Comment 8 Tom "spot" Callaway 2016-10-10 20:10:30 UTC
It's common in perl packages. Because it uses this structure:

/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/DateTime/Calendar/Julian.pm

Any perl-DateTime-Calendar module will put a pm file in there. This one doesn't depend on any other DateTime-Calendar modules, so there is unclear ownership, and when ownership is unclear. it is permissible for multiple packages to share ownership.

Comment 9 Neal Gompa 2016-10-10 20:15:08 UTC
Okay, then. I have no other issues with it.

PACKAGE APPROVED.

Comment 10 Patrick Uiterwijk 2016-10-11 12:32:31 UTC
Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian

Comment 11 Petr Pisar 2016-10-11 13:59:53 UTC
I recommend to build-require: coreutils, findutils, make, and perl. They are all executed from the spec file.

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2016-10-13 03:52:11 UTC
perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian-0.04-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-6b2bbe9827

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2016-10-13 04:52:34 UTC
perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian-0.04-3.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-5a26adaf32

Comment 14 Fedora Update System 2016-10-13 05:53:01 UTC
perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian-0.04-3.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-24e9770688

Comment 15 Fedora Update System 2016-10-20 16:25:10 UTC
perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian-0.04-3.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 16 Fedora Update System 2016-10-24 20:24:00 UTC
perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian-0.04-3.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 17 Fedora Update System 2016-10-24 23:51:01 UTC
perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian-0.04-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.