Bug 138399 – RHNRefEn.pdf, app C, linux process required fields, p150

Bug 138399 - RHNRefEn.pdf, app C, linux process required fields, p150

Summary:	RHNRefEn.pdf, app C, linux process required fields, p150

Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Satellite 5
Classification:	Red Hat
Component:	Documentation (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Clay Murphy
QA Contact:	Red Hat Satellite QA List
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:	Documentation

Depends On:
Blocks:	130315
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2004-11-08 17:02 EST by Adrian Likins
Modified:	2009-08-19 23:08 EDT (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2004-11-09 18:02:54 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Adrian Likins 2004-11-08 17:02:17 EST

on page 150, in section C.5.11

The text mentioned that pid or process name or required
but neither is marked as required in the chart. That
might be intentional but just in case...

Comment 1 Clay Murphy 2004-11-08 17:12:13 EST

Claiming, marking customer facing and blocking the rhn360docs (hosted
docs) tracking bug.

Comment 2 Clay Murphy 2004-11-09 18:02:54 EST

Nice, close review, Adrian. I appreciate it.

In this instance, the lack of required marks is intentional. Since the
user must specify *either* a command or pid, identifying either or
both of them as required would be misleading. Unfortunately, the text
description has to convey this.

Closing NOTABUG.

Comment 3 Clay Murphy 2004-12-02 12:38:04 EST

no docs

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.