Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1385665

Summary:	Incorrect error code returned from krb5_child (updated)
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7	Reporter:	Dan Lavu <dlavu>
Component:	sssd	Assignee:	Sumit Bose <sbose>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Dan Lavu <dlavu>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	7.3	CC:	fidencio, grajaiya, jhrozek, lslebodn, mkosek, mzidek, pasik, pbrezina, sgoveas
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	sssd-1.16.0-22.el7	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2018-10-30 10:40:47 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Dan Lavu 2016-10-17 13:12:26 UTC

Description of problem:

It seems that the exit status has changed causing the following automated test that is used for regression testing to fail.

account-password-policy-003-User-account-disabled
account-password-policy-004-bz1081046-User-account-is-expired 


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Run the AD Parameters test
2. The following test cases; account-password-policy-003-User-account-disabled and account-password-policy-004-bz1081046-User-account-is-expired fails.
3.

Actual results:

:: [   FAIL   ] :: File '/var/log/secure' should contain 'User account has expired' 
:: [   FAIL   ] :: Command 'id user1-1478375 | cut -f2 -d " " | grep group1-1478375' (Expected 0, got 1)

Expected results:

:: [   PASS   ] :: File '/var/log/secure' should contain 'User account has expired' 
:: [   PASS   ] :: Command 'id user1-1478375 | cut -f2 -d " " | grep group1-1478375' (Expected 0, got 1)

Additional info:


Previous patch that caused this bug.

https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org/thread/OM2BME5DKH3HBD23BB5SC73I5VTATIGD/#FFKZZXSHZXYIC3P6H3P4Z5INSPEZD6MC

Comment 1 Lukas Slebodnik 2016-10-17 13:19:00 UTC

Upstream ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3198

Comment 2 Lukas Slebodnik 2016-10-17 13:27:00 UTC

> Previous patch that caused this bug.
> 
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.
> org/thread/OM2BME5DKH3HBD23BB5SC73I5VTATIGD/#FFKZZXSHZXYIC3P6H3P4Z5INSPEZD6MC
The behaviour before the change was not correct either. sssd returned error code for expired user even for disabled user.

The current behaviour is that sssd returns error code for disabled user for expired and disabled user.

This BZ should properly distinguish between expired and disabled user from AD with id provider ad

Comment 4 Jakub Hrozek 2017-03-28 08:09:58 UTC

This bugzilla still needs work upstream. Because we are nearing the development freeze of RHEL-7.4 and the work is not finished yet, I'm reproposing the bug to RHEL-7.5.

Please push back if you disagree.

Comment 8 Jakub Hrozek 2018-02-07 14:00:31 UTC

* master:
 * d380148b0a23dd1a04d1d0767ba41d3e76fb7d23
 * 5a7b76bf3dc1b7a4a6ca6608c750cbffef73a3eb

Comment 10 Dan Lavu 2018-07-18 18:42:34 UTC

Verified. 

Jul 18 02:39:44 cypher sshd[25498]: pam_sss(sshd:account): system info: [The user account is expired on the AD server]
Jul 18 02:39:44 cypher sshd[25498]: pam_sss(sshd:account): Access denied for user testuser01-2620451: 13 (User account has expired)
Jul 18 02:39:44 cypher sshd[25498]: fatal: Access denied for user testuser01-2620451 by PAM account configuration [preauth]
Jul 18 02:42:38 cypher su: pam_unix(su:session): session opened for user nobody by (uid=0)


tested against sssd-1.16.2-7.el7.x86_64, test case needs to be updated since the secure message has changed.

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2018-10-30 10:40:47 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3158