Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1387004

Summary: rebase libgexiv2 to 0.10.4
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Matthias Clasen <mclasen>
Component: libgexiv2Assignee: Richard Hughes <rhughes>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Desktop QE <desktop-qa-list>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 7.4CC: debarshir, mcepl, mclasen, tpelka
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Rebase
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: libgexiv2-0.10.4-2.el7 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-08-01 09:58:23 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1383353    

Description Matthias Clasen 2016-10-20 00:37:22 UTC 
This is part of rebasing GNOME to 0.22
Comment 3 Matěj Cepl 2017-03-16 18:52:24 UTC 
Trying to develop an implementation of make check in https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=723790

Would it be possible to add (when finished) to the package?
Comment 4 Matěj Cepl 2017-03-24 13:48:41 UTC 
When looking at https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=723790 I found that we don't have in our package fix for https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775249 (which was not included in the upstream tarball for 0.10.4). Could/should we include it as a distribution patch? It would make the test suite to have at least two tests ;)
Comment 5 Tomas Pelka 2017-03-24 13:58:48 UTC 
(In reply to Matěj Cepl from comment #4)
> When looking at https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=723790 I found
> that we don't have in our package fix for
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775249 (which was not included in
> the upstream tarball for 0.10.4). Could/should we include it as a
> distribution patch? It would make the test suite to have at least two tests
> ;)

Matthias what do you think?

Thanks
-Tom
Comment 7 Richard Hughes 2017-03-30 13:19:19 UTC 
I think we agreed that we should add the tests upstream and then pick them up next time we rebased. I don't think the simple tests as is actually test very much and are not IMHO a reason to fail QA.
Comment 8 Debarshi Ray 2017-05-19 17:15:29 UTC 
The names of the Python subpackages were changed to better comply with the packaging guidelines. However that had some fallout in Fedora:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QKXEMPU64RKMQY3AGIOG6GM7EVU4HQX2/

I have added the necessary Provides to retain compatibility in libgexiv2-0.10.4-2.el7:
https://brewweb.engineering.redhat.com/brew/taskinfo?taskID=13241347
Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2017-08-01 09:58:23 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:2307