Trying to develop an implementation of make check in https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=723790

Would it be possible to add (when finished) to the package?

When looking at https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=723790 I found that we don't have in our package fix for https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775249 (which was not included in the upstream tarball for 0.10.4). Could/should we include it as a distribution patch? It would make the test suite to have at least two tests ;)

(In reply to Matěj Cepl from comment #4)
> When looking at https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=723790 I found
> that we don't have in our package fix for
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775249 (which was not included in
> the upstream tarball for 0.10.4). Could/should we include it as a
> distribution patch? It would make the test suite to have at least two tests
> ;)

Matthias what do you think?

Thanks
-Tom

I think we agreed that we should add the tests upstream and then pick them up next time we rebased. I don't think the simple tests as is actually test very much and are not IMHO a reason to fail QA.

The names of the Python subpackages were changed to better comply with the packaging guidelines. However that had some fallout in Fedora:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QKXEMPU64RKMQY3AGIOG6GM7EVU4HQX2/

I have added the necessary Provides to retain compatibility in libgexiv2-0.10.4-2.el7:
https://brewweb.engineering.redhat.com/brew/taskinfo?taskID=13241347

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:2307