Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Description of problem:
The patch openssl-1.0.1e-3des-strength.patch has a superfluous empty line in line 32 which makes the patch program ignore the following hunk. The patch looks like it would set four numbers to 112, but it only changes three. I found out about this when I tried building the package on el5 because el5's patch program complains about this and does not silently throw the hunk away.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7
How reproducible:
Looking at ssl/s2_lib.c, around line 250 (block named "DES_192_EDE3_CBC_WITH_MD5")
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Compiled source code does not match the (presumed) expectations of the patch author
Expected results:
Patch and compiled source code agree
Additional info: