Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1388617

Summary: [SELinux] Bad boolean declaration at /etc/selinux/targeted/tmp/modules/100/virt/cil:159
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Prasanth <pprakash>
Component: dockerAssignee: Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: atomic-bugs <atomic-bugs>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 7.3CC: amurdaca, annair, dwalsh, hchiramm, joedward, lpabon, lsm5, lvrabec, mgrepl, mliyazud, mmalik, plautrba, pprakash, pvrabec, rcyriac, rhs-bugs, sankarshan, ssekidde, stwalter
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Extras, Reopened
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1388616 Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-06-30 15:08:00 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1388616    

Description Prasanth 2016-10-25 18:48:31 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1388616 +++

Description of problem:

I'm seeing the following warning/error while installing docker:

##########

  Installing : policycoreutils-python-2.5-8.el7.x86_64              11/15 
  Installing : docker-selinux-1.10.3-46.el7.14.x86_64               12/15 
Re-declaration of boolean virt_sandbox_use_fusefs
Failed to create node
Bad boolean declaration at /etc/selinux/targeted/tmp/modules/100/virt/cil:159
/usr/sbin/semodule:  Failed!
libsemanage.semanage_direct_install_info: Overriding docker module at lower priority 100 with module at priority 400.
  Installing : docker-common-1.10.3-46.el7.14.x86_64                13/15 
##########

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
docker-selinux-1.10.3-46.el7.14.x86_64
docker-1.10.3-46.el7.14.x86_64
selinux-policy-3.13.1-102.el7.noarch

How reproducible: Always


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install RHEL 7.3 RC build
2. Subscribe to the relevant repos 
3. #yum install docker

Actual results: 


Expected results:


Additional info:

--- Additional comment from Red Hat Bugzilla Rules Engine on 2016-10-25 14:45:21 EDT ---

This bug is automatically being proposed for the current release of Red Hat Gluster Storage 3 under active development, by setting the release flag 'rhgs‑3.2.0' to '?'. 

If this bug should be proposed for a different release, please manually change the proposed release flag.

Comment 1 Milos Malik 2016-10-26 13:17:52 UTC
This should be fixed in docker-selinux package, right?

Comment 2 Prasanth 2016-11-02 14:02:35 UTC
(In reply to Milos Malik from comment #1)
> This should be fixed in docker-selinux package, right?

Yea, looks like. Is that handled by a different team? If so, please feel free to re-assign this BZ to the appropriate team or let me know to whom it should be assigned to.

Comment 3 Lukas Vrabec 2016-11-04 12:16:42 UTC
Yes, docker policy is shipped by docker team.

Comment 4 Daniel Walsh 2016-11-04 12:37:20 UTC
Lokesh I thought we were shipping a later version of docker and docker-selinux with a fix for this. Is this a problem with the release?

Comment 5 Lokesh Mandvekar 2016-11-07 13:56:21 UTC
7.2.7 had 1.10.3-46, 7.3.0 has 1.10.3-57

Comment 6 Prasanth 2016-11-08 07:04:56 UTC
This works for me with the latest docker-selinux build. Hence closing this BZ.

Comment 9 Daniel Walsh 2017-01-13 13:38:12 UTC
Yes this is an ordering problem.  container-selinux disables docker.pp when it installs.  This looks like you had a previous bad container-selinux installed.

Older versions of container SELinux would remove the docker.pp file, which would just get installed on the next selinux-policy update.  The latest container-selinux should disable docker.pp and replace it with container.pp.  Then if a new update of selinux-policy comes along with docker.pp, it will get installed but still be disabled, preventing this issue.

You can verify this by looking at 

# semanage module --list -C

You can also reinstall selinux-policy

dnf -y reinstall selinux-policy-targeted

And see that it does not complain about docker module.

Bottom line, I think this is fixed and on a fresh install it should not happen.

If this is not true then this is a bug.