Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Description of problem:
When remediation of script, where gpgcheck=1 is commented out, this script does not fix the issue [as it fixes the commented out line, if needed].
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
scap-security-guide-0.1.30-3.el7.noarch
How reproducible:
easily
Steps to Reproduce:
1. comment gpgcheck line in /etc/yum.conf
2. run check with remediation
3.
Actual results:
/etc/yum.conf contains #gpgcheck=1, no other line with gpgcheck is present
Expected results:
uncommented line gpgcheck=1 is present
Additional info:
Comment 2Raphael Sanchez Prudencio
2017-03-08 09:43:37 UTC
Verified for version scap-security-guide-0.1.33-5.el7.noarch
Verification performed using SSG Test Suite https://github.com/OpenSCAP/scap-security-guide/commits/ba02d65857f02c824e18878e238ff8a9aea657c1
OLD:
scap-security-guide-0.1.30-3.el7.noarch
INFO - xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_ensure_gpgcheck_globally_activated
INFO - Script comment.fail.sh using profile xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_profile_ospp-rhel7-server
ERROR - Scan has exited with return code 2, instead of expected 0 during stage remediation
ERROR - Rule result should have been "fixed", but is "fail, error"!
INFO - Script line_not_there.fail.sh using profile xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_profile_ospp-rhel7-server
ERROR - Scan has exited with return code 2, instead of expected 0 during stage remediation
ERROR - Rule result should have been "fixed", but is "fail, error"!
INFO - Script wrong_value.fail.sh using profile xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_profile_ospp-rhel7-server
INFO - Script correct_value.pass.sh using profile xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_profile_ospp-rhel7-server
INFO - All snapshots reverted successfully
NEW:
INFO - xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_ensure_gpgcheck_globally_activated
INFO - Script comment.fail.sh using profile xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_profile_ospp-rhel7
INFO - Script line_not_there.fail.sh using profile xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_profile_ospp-rhel7
INFO - Script wrong_value.fail.sh using profile xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_profile_ospp-rhel7
INFO - Script correct_value.pass.sh using profile xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_profile_ospp-rhel7
INFO - All snapshots reverted successfully
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.
For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.
If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:2064