Hide Forgot
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1388827 +++ (below trimmed for relevance) --- Additional comment from Jan Pokorný on 2016-10-24 03:43:25 EDT --- pacemaker_remoted 1.1.15 won't talk to pacemaker 1.1.14 [the source of the issue is apparent in the logs on pacemaker_remoted side] --- Additional comment from Andrew Beekhof on 2016-10-26 05:23:04 EDT --- Here's what we need to do: 2. Set LRMD_PROTOCOL_VERSION back to 1.0 in 7.3 builds 5. Add a "review lrmd changes that might require bumping LRMD_PROTOCOL_VERSION" to the upstream release checklist 6. Ensure that new lrm features think about how to handle "old" remotes in the future 7. Update the docs to indicate that the software version on remote nodes must be lte the lowest version in the main cluster --- Additional comment from Ken Gaillot on 2016-10-26 12:03:53 EDT --- Update: it has been determined that the protocol version change was not strictly necessary in any case, so Comment 1's step 2 is sufficient to fix the issue (steps 5-7 are still worthwhile for the future) . --- Additional comment from Ken Gaillot on 2016-10-26 12:42:11 EDT --- QA: Test procedure is to set up a pacemaker cluster that includes remote nodes, using the 7.2 packages, then do a rolling upgrade to the current packages (i.e. one node at a time, pcs cluster stop, yum update, pcs cluster start). There should be no failures, unexpected stops, or fencing, regardless of which order nodes are upgraded (in particular, a newer remote node connecting to an older cluster node, and an older remote node connecting to a newer cluster node).
Cluster of 3 nodes + 2 pacemaker_remote nodes successfully passed automated rolling upgrade test from RHEL-6.8 to 6.9 using the pacemaker-1.1.15-3.el6 packages. See full log at http://pastebin.test.redhat.com/447152 -- marking verified.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2017-0629.html