Bug 1389125 - viostor extend viostor driver with STORAGE_REQUEST_BLOCK support
Summary: viostor extend viostor driver with STORAGE_REQUEST_BLOCK support
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: virtio-win
Version: 7.4
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Vadim Rozenfeld
QA Contact: Virtualization Bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-10-26 23:11 UTC by Vadim Rozenfeld
Modified: 2017-08-01 12:53 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Feature: STORAGE_REQUEST_BLOCK support Reason: The STORAGE_REQUEST_BLOCK is the extended format SCSI Request Block (SRB) structure. Starting in Windows 8, an extended SRB type is supported with the use of the STORAGE_REQUEST_BLOCK structure. Result: STORAGE_REQUEST_BLOCK extends SRB functions, allowing extended data blocks for the SRB function to be added to the request.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-08-01 12:53:08 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2017:2341 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE virtio-win bug fix and enhancement update 2017-08-01 16:52:38 UTC

Description Vadim Rozenfeld 2016-10-26 23:11:00 UTC
Description of problem:

The STORAGE_REQUEST_BLOCK is the extended format SCSI Request Block (SRB) structure. Starting in Windows 8, an extended SRB type is supported with the use of the STORAGE_REQUEST_BLOCK structure. STORAGE_REQUEST_BLOCK extends SRB functions, allowing extended data blocks for the SRB function to be added to the request.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Vadim Rozenfeld 2016-10-31 06:21:44 UTC
At this stage we just need to check that the  
driver, compiled for Win8/Win10 platforms 
continues  operate properly.

Comment 2 Vadim Rozenfeld 2017-05-25 00:08:37 UTC
Changes for this case were introduces in build 128. As long as we have no regressions in WHQL and functional tests, I would count it as verified.

Thanks,
Vadim.

Comment 3 lijin 2017-05-25 01:51:22 UTC
Change status to verified as whql and function test passed.

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2017-08-01 12:53:08 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:2341


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.