Bug 1389228 (CVE-2016-5875) - CVE-2016-5875 libtiff: PixarLogDecode Heap Buffer Overflow
Summary: CVE-2016-5875 libtiff: PixarLogDecode Heap Buffer Overflow
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: CVE-2016-5875
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Red Hat Product Security
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
: CVE-2016-5317 CVE-2016-5314 (view as bug list)
Depends On: 1389231 1389232 1389233
Blocks: 1346703 1389235
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-10-27 08:42 UTC by Andrej Nemec
Modified: 2021-02-17 03:06 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-01-12 07:57:17 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Andrej Nemec 2016-10-27 08:42:11 UTC
An exploitable heap based buffer overflow exists in the handling of compressed TIFF images in LibTIFF’s PixarLogDecode api. A crafted TIFF document can lead to a heap based buffer overflow resulting in remote code execution. The vulnerability can be triggered through any user controlled TIFF that is handled by this functionality.

External References:

http://www.talosintelligence.com/reports/TALOS-2016-0205

Comment 1 Andrej Nemec 2016-10-27 08:47:21 UTC
Created libtiff tracking bugs for this issue:

Affects: fedora-all [bug 1389231]

Comment 2 Andrej Nemec 2016-10-27 08:47:27 UTC
Created mingw-libtiff tracking bugs for this issue:

Affects: fedora-all [bug 1389232]
Affects: epel-7 [bug 1389233]

Comment 3 Salvatore Bonaccorso 2016-10-28 05:08:15 UTC
Hi

According to TALOS-2016-0205 the actual CVE ID should be CVE-2016-5875. So is the CVE-2016-5857 alias a typo?

Thanks already for clarification.

Regards,
Salvatore

Comment 4 Tomas Hoger 2016-10-28 07:31:50 UTC
Seem like a typo, yes.  Fixing.  Thank you!

Comment 8 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2017-01-12 07:57:17 UTC
Statement:

This security flaw is addressed by the patch released for CVE-2016-5320. Therefore Red Hat Enterprise Linux packages are not affected.

Comment 10 Stefan Cornelius 2017-06-27 08:58:25 UTC
*** Bug 1346689 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 11 Stefan Cornelius 2017-06-27 11:52:05 UTC
*** Bug 1346697 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.