Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 1389228 - (CVE-2016-5875) CVE-2016-5875 libtiff: PixarLogDecode Heap Buffer Overflow
CVE-2016-5875 libtiff: PixarLogDecode Heap Buffer Overflow
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability (Show other bugs)
unspecified
All Linux
high Severity high
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Red Hat Product Security
impact=important,public=20161025,repo...
: Security
: CVE-2016-5317 CVE-2016-5314 (view as bug list)
Depends On: 1389233 1389231 1389232
Blocks: 1346703 1389235
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2016-10-27 04:42 EDT by Andrej Nemec
Modified: 2017-06-27 07:52 EDT (History)
7 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-01-12 02:57:17 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

  None (edit)
Description Andrej Nemec 2016-10-27 04:42:11 EDT 
An exploitable heap based buffer overflow exists in the handling of compressed TIFF images in LibTIFF’s PixarLogDecode api. A crafted TIFF document can lead to a heap based buffer overflow resulting in remote code execution. The vulnerability can be triggered through any user controlled TIFF that is handled by this functionality.

External References:

http://www.talosintelligence.com/reports/TALOS-2016-0205
Comment 1 Andrej Nemec 2016-10-27 04:47:21 EDT 
Created libtiff tracking bugs for this issue:

Affects: fedora-all [bug 1389231]
Comment 2 Andrej Nemec 2016-10-27 04:47:27 EDT 
Created mingw-libtiff tracking bugs for this issue:

Affects: fedora-all [bug 1389232]
Affects: epel-7 [bug 1389233]
Comment 3 Salvatore Bonaccorso 2016-10-28 01:08:15 EDT 
Hi

According to TALOS-2016-0205 the actual CVE ID should be CVE-2016-5875. So is the CVE-2016-5857 alias a typo?

Thanks already for clarification.

Regards,
Salvatore
Comment 4 Tomas Hoger 2016-10-28 03:31:50 EDT 
Seem like a typo, yes.  Fixing.  Thank you!
Comment 8 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2017-01-12 02:57:17 EST 
Statement:

This security flaw is addressed by the patch released for CVE-2016-5320. Therefore Red Hat Enterprise Linux packages are not affected.
Comment 10 Stefan Cornelius 2017-06-27 04:58:25 EDT 
*** Bug 1346689 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 Stefan Cornelius 2017-06-27 07:52:05 EDT 
*** Bug 1346697 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.