Bug 138949 - SELinux policy packages should be upgraded before udev?
Summary: SELinux policy packages should be upgraded before udev?
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: selinux-policy-strict
Version: 3
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Daniel Walsh
QA Contact: Mike McLean
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2004-11-12 01:50 UTC by Aleksey Nogin
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:10 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-11-17 20:24:18 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Aleksey Nogin 2004-11-12 01:50:13 UTC
I am upgrading SELinux-enables FC2 to FC3. When anaconda was upgrading
the udev package, it complained (a lot) about invalid contexts in
/etc/security/selinux/file_contexts. Would it be a good idea to try to
avoid these warning messages by upgrading the SELinux policy packages
before udev?

Comment 1 Jeremy Katz 2004-11-12 15:58:38 UTC
anaconda orders things entirely based on what the RPM package ordering
is (which is based on dependencies).  Assigning to selinux-policy as
it's a transition issue from the FC2 -> FC3 SELinux.

Comment 2 Daniel Walsh 2004-11-17 20:24:18 UTC
This is a difficult problem since we do not want to put a dependancy
in udev on a particular SELinux policy.  So I guess the only thing I
can say is that I hope policy will not change as radically as it did
between FC2 and FC3 again.



Comment 3 Harald Hoyer 2004-11-18 10:42:01 UTC
well, I could put a "conflicts" in udev

Comment 4 Daniel Walsh 2004-11-18 15:05:05 UTC
What would that do?  I though conflicts would prevent udev from being
installed?

Dan


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.