Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 1390163 - (CVE-2016-8867) CVE-2016-8867 docker: Ambient capability usage in containers
CVE-2016-8867 docker: Ambient capability usage in containers
Status: NEW
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability (Show other bugs)
unspecified
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Red Hat Product Security
impact=moderate,public=20161024,repor...
: Security
Depends On: 1390104
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2016-10-31 07:27 EDT by Andrej Nemec
Modified: 2018-06-29 18:15 EDT (History)
27 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: docker 1.12.3
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Andrej Nemec 2016-10-31 07:27:14 EDT
It was found that Docker 1.12.2 did not correctly apply user permissions in containers

Upstream bug:

https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/27590

Upstream patch:

https://github.com/docker/docker/pull/27610/commits/d60a3418d0268745dff38947bc8c929fbd24f837
Comment 1 Florian Weimer 2016-10-31 15:41:51 EDT
This seems to be the actual fix attempt:

https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/commit/a83f5bac28554fa0fd49bc1559a3c79f5907348f

The fix looks correct.  It deals with an embedded ')', as long as newer kernel versions do not add more non-escaped free-text fields at the end which could contain another ')'.
Comment 2 Antonio Murdaca 2016-10-31 16:39:37 EDT
No, the actual fix was to revert the commit which introduced ambient capabilities in runc afaict (I don't have the link handy). 

The runc version we use in projectatomic/runc in branch docker-1.12.3 contains the actual fix. 

That commit is just a fix for a panic afaict (?)
Comment 3 Florian Weimer 2016-10-31 17:01:21 EDT
(In reply to Antonio Murdaca from comment #2)
> No, the actual fix was to revert the commit which introduced ambient
> capabilities in runc afaict (I don't have the link handy). 
> 
> The runc version we use in projectatomic/runc in branch docker-1.12.3
> contains the actual fix. 
> 
> That commit is just a fix for a panic afaict (?)

Ohh, that might be the case.  I thought it might cause the process start time to be misidentified, which could be a security problem in itself because PID and start time are sometimes (ab)used as a unique ID.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.