Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 1390326 - nmap is not able to resolve hostname.
nmap is not able to resolve hostname.
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: nmap (Show other bugs)
7.3
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: rc
: ---
Assigned To: Pavel Zhukov
Jaroslav Aster
: Patch
Depends On:
Blocks: 1465887 1465928
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2016-10-31 13:08 EDT by Jaroslav Aster
Modified: 2018-04-10 04:37 EDT (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: nmap-6.40-8.el7
Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
undefined
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1284866
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-04-10 04:36:10 EDT
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2018:0661 None None None 2018-04-10 04:37 EDT

  None (edit)
Description Jaroslav Aster 2016-10-31 13:08:28 EDT
There is the same issue on nmap-6.40-7.el7. Tested on the same scenario as was described in original bug 1284866.

# nmap -O -T5 192.168.23.84
Starting Nmap 6.40 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2016-10-31 12:58 EDT
Nmap scan report for 192.168.23.84
Host is up (0.000011s latency).
Not shown: 997 closed ports
PORT     STATE SERVICE
22/tcp   open  ssh
111/tcp  open  rpcbind
2049/tcp open  nfs
Device type: general purpose
Running: Linux 3.X
OS CPE: cpe:/o:linux:linux_kernel:3
OS details: Linux 3.7 - 3.9
Network Distance: 0 hops

# nmap -O -T5 192.168.23.84 --system-dns
Starting Nmap 6.40 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2016-10-31 12:58 EDT
Nmap scan report for www.example.com (192.168.23.84)
Host is up (0.0000090s latency).
Not shown: 997 closed ports
PORT     STATE SERVICE
22/tcp   open  ssh
111/tcp  open  rpcbind
2049/tcp open  nfs
Device type: general purpose
Running: Linux 3.X
OS CPE: cpe:/o:linux:linux_kernel:3
OS details: Linux 3.7 - 3.9
Network Distance: 0 hops
Comment 1 Daniel Miller 2017-03-17 17:19:41 EDT
Where is the name record for 192.168.23.84 defined? Is it in /etc/hosts?

Nmap's internal resolver parses /etc/hosts and searches it first, falling back to its parallel reverse-DNS resolver if an entry does not exist. It's possible that there's a bug in /etc/hosts parser, though it's very old and robust. We made changes to it in Nmap 6.49BETA6 to support IPv6, but those changes are not in 6.40.

Another possibility is a bug in the reverse-DNS resolver. We made big changes to this in Nmap 7.00 and again in 7.30 to handle more edge cases like truncated answers and other oddities.

The final possibility is that the system resolver is using some other method unknown to Nmap to resolve this name. NIS+, LDAP, or other directory services could be providing the name, and Nmap is unable (in this particular scan phase) to use those services.
Comment 2 Jaroslav Aster 2017-05-10 10:41:42 EDT
Hi Daniel,

the record for 192.168.23.84 is defined in named reverse zone.

# cat /etc/named.conf
...
zone "23.168.192.in-addr.arpa" IN {
        type master;
        file "/var/named/tmp.lOpim5IhLe";
};

# cat /var/named/tmp.lOpim5IhLe
$TTL 2d  ; 172800 seconds
$ORIGIN 23.168.192.IN-ADDR.ARPA.
@             IN      SOA   ns1.example.com. hostmaster.example.com. (
                              2003080800 ; serial number
                              3h         ; refresh
                              15m        ; update retry
                              3w         ; expiry
                              3h         ; nx = nxdomain ttl
                              )
                IN NS ns1.example.com.
                IN NS ns2.example.com.
                IN NS cdnxxxx0.ccsrm.in.
                IN NS cdnxxxx1.ccsrm.in.
                IN NS rdndlxx0.ccsrm.in.
                IN NS rdnhrxx0.ccsrm.in.
                IN NS rdnkaxx0.ccsrm.in.
                IN NS rdncaxx0.ccsrm.in.
                IN NS rdnmbxx0.ccsrm.in.
                IN NS rdnrjxx0.ccsrm.in.
                IN NS rdntnxx0.ccsrm.in.
                IN NS rdnmhxx0.ccsrm.in.
                IN NS rdngjxx0.ccsrm.in.
                IN NS rdnapxx0.ccsrm.in.
                IN NS rdnkrxx0.ccsrm.in.
                IN NS rdnpbxx0.ccsrm.in.
                IN NS rdnuwxx0.ccsrm.in.
                IN NS rdnuexx0.ccsrm.in.
                IN NS rdnmpxx0.ccsrm.in.
                IN NS rdncdxx0.ccsrm.in.
                IN NS rdnhpxx0.ccsrm.in.
                IN NS rdnbhxx0.ccsrm.in.
                IN NS rdnosxx0.ccsrm.in.
                IN NS rdnasxx0.ccsrm.in.
                IN NS rdnnexx0.ccsrm.in.
                IN NS rdnjkxx0.ccsrm.in.
84              IN PTR  www.example.com.
2               IN PTR  joe.example.com.
17              IN PTR  bill.example.com.
10              IN PTR hrwbdlxx1.ccsrm.in.     
11              IN PTR hrwbdlxx2.ccsrm.in.
12              IN PTR hrdbdlxx1.ccsrm.in.
13              IN PTR hrdbdlxx2.ccsrm.in.
31              IN PTR hrsmdlxx1.ccsrm.in.
32              IN PTR hrsmdlxx2.ccsrm.in.

# host 192.168.23.84
;; Truncated, retrying in TCP mode.
84.23.168.192.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer www.example.com.

# nmap -O -T5 192.168.23.84 | grep 'www.example.com'

# nmap -O -T5 --system-dns 192.168.23.84 | grep 'www.example.com'
Nmap scan report for www.example.com (192.168.23.84)

The issue is the same as was reported in bug 1284866 for rhel-6. The issue is that nmap can't handle dns response higher that 512B, because it uses only udp. When I switch from internal resolver to system resolver (--system-dns), it works. It was fixed in rhel-6.
Comment 5 Pavel Zhukov 2017-08-14 10:33:55 EDT
(In reply to Daniel Miller from comment #1)

> Another possibility is a bug in the reverse-DNS resolver. We made big
> changes to this in Nmap 7.00 and again in 7.30 to handle more edge cases
> like truncated answers and other oddities.
Thanks Daniel. 
We had downstream version of [1] for truncated answers in RHEL6 but it's missed in RHEL7. 
[1] https://github.com/nmap/nmap/commit/0c1d68d6de6b43c0aff8d58fed36cb5025472ecb
Comment 14 errata-xmlrpc 2018-04-10 04:36:10 EDT
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:0661

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.