Bug 1392309
| Summary: | Review Request: python-os-faults - OpenStack fault-injection library | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Community] RDO | Reporter: | Chandan Kumar <chkumar> | |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Javier Peña <jpena> | |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Javier Peña <jpena> | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | ||
| Priority: | medium | |||
| Version: | trunk | CC: | chkumar, chris.brown, jpena, package-review, tvignaud | |
| Target Milestone: | --- | |||
| Target Release: | trunk | |||
| Hardware: | All | |||
| OS: | Linux | |||
| Whiteboard: | ||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | ||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
| Clone Of: | ||||
| : | 1400278 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-06-22 15:37:12 UTC | Type: | --- | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
| Embargoed: | ||||
| Bug Depends On: | ||||
| Bug Blocks: | 1373513, 1400278 | |||
|
Description
Chandan Kumar
2016-11-07 07:32:40 UTC
Hi Chandan, Some initial comments on the review: - There is no python-ansible package, it is called ansible. - For consistency, please rename the python-os-faults-libvirt subpackage to python2-os-faults-libvirt. - As a nitpick, the %description field for subpackages only includes the generic os-faults description, but nothing specific to the subpackage itself. It would be nice to add a line about each. Hello Jpena, Thanks for the review. All the above comments are fixed. Here is the updated SPEC file: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-os-faults.spec SRPM: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-os-faults-0.1.5-2.fc24.src.rpm and successful Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16333391 Thanks, Chandan Kumar Here is the updated SPEC file: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-os-faults.spec SRPM: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-os-faults-0.1.5-3.fc24.src.rpm and successful Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16333720 We still have two issues (see rpmlint section below):
- The libvirt compiled files end up in the wrong subpackage. You just need to change the following:
%exclude %{python2_sitelib}/%{pypi_name}/drivers/libvirt_driver.py*
%files -n python2-%{sname}-libvirt
%license LICENSE
%{python2_sitelib}/%{pypi_name}/drivers/libvirt_driver.py*
And the same applies to the python3 subpackage.
- Also, the generated rpms fail to install because they require a newer version of python-pyghmi (>= 1.0.3) than available in the repo (0.8.0). We'll need to get a newer dependency or remove the version from the requirement, although I'm afraid the latter will cause issues down the road.
Package Review
==============
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
=======
- Package installs properly.
Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
===== MUST items =====
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache
(v2.0)". 9 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck
in /tmp/1392309-python-os-faults/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python2
-os-faults , python2-os-faults-libvirt , python2-os-faults-tests ,
python-os-faults-doc
[!]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic:
[!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: Mock build failed
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#rpmlint
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Installation errors
-------------------
INFO: mock.py version 1.2.21 starting (python version = 3.5.1)...
Start: init plugins
INFO: tmpfs initialized
INFO: selinux enabled
Finish: init plugins
Start: run
Start: chroot init
INFO: mounting tmpfs at /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root.
INFO: reusing tmpfs at /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root.
INFO: calling preinit hooks
INFO: enabled root cache
INFO: enabled dnf cache
Start: cleaning dnf metadata
Finish: cleaning dnf metadata
Mock Version: 1.2.21
INFO: Mock Version: 1.2.21
Finish: chroot init
INFO: installing package(s): /tmp/1392309-python-os-faults/results/python2-os-faults-libvirt-0.1.5-3.fc26.noarch.rpm /tmp/1392309-python-os-faults/results/python2-os-faults-0.1.5-3.fc26.noarch.rpm /tmp/1392309-python-os-faults/results/python-os-faults-doc-0.1.5-3.fc26.noarch.rpm /tmp/1392309-python-os-faults/results/python2-os-faults-tests-0.1.5-3.fc26.noarch.rpm
ERROR: Command failed. See logs for output.
# /usr/bin/dnf --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ --releasever 26 --disableplugin=local --setopt=deltarpm=false install /tmp/1392309-python-os-faults/results/python2-os-faults-libvirt-0.1.5-3.fc26.noarch.rpm /tmp/1392309-python-os-faults/results/python2-os-faults-0.1.5-3.fc26.noarch.rpm /tmp/1392309-python-os-faults/results/python-os-faults-doc-0.1.5-3.fc26.noarch.rpm /tmp/1392309-python-os-faults/results/python2-os-faults-tests-0.1.5-3.fc26.noarch.rpm --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: python2-os-faults-0.1.5-3.fc26.noarch.rpm
python2-os-faults-libvirt-0.1.5-3.fc26.noarch.rpm
python2-os-faults-tests-0.1.5-3.fc26.noarch.rpm
python-os-faults-doc-0.1.5-3.fc26.noarch.rpm
python-os-faults-0.1.5-3.fc26.src.rpm
python2-os-faults.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US faultinjection -> fault injection, fault-injection, interjection
python2-os-faults.noarch: W: python-bytecode-without-source /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/os_faults/drivers/libvirt_driver.pyo
python2-os-faults.noarch: W: python-bytecode-without-source /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/os_faults/drivers/libvirt_driver.pyc
python2-os-faults.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary os-inject-fault-2.7
python2-os-faults.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary os-inject-fault-2
python2-os-faults.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary os-inject-fault
python2-os-faults-libvirt.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US faultinjection -> fault injection, fault-injection, interjection
python2-os-faults-libvirt.noarch: W: no-documentation
python2-os-faults-tests.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US faultinjection -> fault injection, fault-injection, interjection
python2-os-faults-tests.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unittests -> unit tests, unit-tests, unites
python2-os-faults-tests.noarch: W: no-documentation
python-os-faults-doc.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized C os_faults documentation
python-os-faults-doc.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US faultinjection -> fault injection, fault-injection, interjection
python-os-faults.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US faultinjection -> fault injection, fault-injection, interjection
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 14 warnings.
Requires
--------
python-os-faults-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
python2-os-faults (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
/usr/bin/python
/usr/bin/python2
PyYAML
ansible
python(abi)
python-appdirs
python-iso8601
python-jsonschema
python-oslo-i18n
python-oslo-serialization
python-oslo-utils
python-pbr
python-pyghmi
python-setuptools
python-six
python2-os-faults-tests (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
pytest
python(abi)
python-coverage
python-ddt
python-mock
python-oslotest
python-subunit
python-testrepository
python-testscenarios
python-testtools
python2-os-faults
python2-os-faults-libvirt (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
python(abi)
python-libvirt
python2-os-faults
Provides
--------
python-os-faults-doc:
python-os-faults-doc
python2-os-faults:
python-os-faults
python2-os-faults
python2.7dist(os-faults)
python2dist(os-faults)
python2-os-faults-tests:
python2-os-faults-tests
python2-os-faults-libvirt:
python2-os-faults-libvirt
Source checksums
----------------
https://tarballs.openstack.org/os-faults/os_faults-0.1.5.tar.gz :
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : db9c8eda6dee10d3b73ddd7432f128f6463eadcbefa012749da779ac3077d6f9
CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : db9c8eda6dee10d3b73ddd7432f128f6463eadcbefa012749da779ac3077d6f9
Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1392309 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP
Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6
Here is the updated SPEC file: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-os-faults.spec SRPM: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-os-faults-0.1.5-4.fc24.src.rpm and successful Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16334626 Chandan, could you upload a final spec and srpm based on the version merged in https://github.com/rdo-packages/os-faults-distgit ? With that, I'll prepare the final fedora-review report. This package landed so closing. |