Bug 1392747 - [RFE] Need a commandline option to get the yaml/json output similar to 'Host' option of webUI
Summary: [RFE] Need a commandline option to get the yaml/json output similar to 'Host'...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1372731
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Hammer
Version: 6.2.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: Unspecified
Assignee: satellite6-bugs
QA Contact: Katello QA List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-11-08 06:41 UTC by hprakash
Modified: 2020-12-14 07:51 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-11-08 10:25:57 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description hprakash 2016-11-08 06:41:20 UTC
1. Proposed title of this feature request  
  Need a commandline option to get the yaml/json output
  
2. Who is the customer behind the request?  
Acxiom c/o D&B 
  
TAM customer: no/yes  
SRM customer: no/yes  
Strategic: no/yes  
  
3. What is the nature and description of the request?  
  Need a commandline option to get the yaml/json output similar to the json output of YAML tab(Host-->YAML) OR maybe an option to download the YAML output in a file.
4. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)  
  
5. How would the customer like to achieve this? (List the functional requirements here)  
  Customer needs an option with hammer CLI
6. For each functional requirement listed, specify how Red Hat and the customer can test to confirm the requirement is successfully implemented.  
  The new hammer option should have the same output as of 'Host' in the webUI.
7. Is there already an existing RFE upstream or in Red Hat Bugzilla?  
  No
8. Does the customer have any specific timeline dependencies and which release would they like to target (i.e. RHEL5, RHEL6)?  
  No
9. Is the sales team involved in this request and do they have any additional input?  
  
10. List any affected packages or components.  
  
11. Would the customer be able to assist in testing this functionality if implemented?  
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 hprakash 2016-11-08 10:25:57 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1372731 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.