RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1396985 - dhcpd only supports insecure HMAC-MD5 algorhitm for DDNS
Summary: dhcpd only supports insecure HMAC-MD5 algorhitm for DDNS
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: dhcp
Version: 7.3
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Pavel Zhukov
QA Contact: Release Test Team
Ioanna Gkioka
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1465887 1465928
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-11-21 10:29 UTC by Tuomo Soini
Modified: 2020-12-14 07:53 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version: dhcp-4.2.5-61.el7
Doc Type: Release Note
Doc Text:
`DDNS` now supports additional algorithms Previously, the `dhcpd` daemon supported only the `HMAC-MD5` hashing algorithm which is considered insecure for critical applications. As a consequence, the `Dynamic DNS (DDNS)` updates were potentially insecure. This update adds support for additional algorithms: `HMAC-SHA1`, `HMAC-SHA224`, `HMAC-SHA256`, `HMAC-SHA384`, or `HMAC-SHA512`.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-04-10 08:00:52 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Backported upstream fix (3.77 KB, text/plain)
2016-11-21 10:29 UTC, Tuomo Soini
no flags Details


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 1066603 0 low CLOSED [RFE] dhcpd is not able to use HMAC-SHA1 or better for dyndns updates 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2018:0658 0 None None None 2018-04-10 08:01:58 UTC

Internal Links: 1066603

Description Tuomo Soini 2016-11-21 10:29:55 UTC
Created attachment 1222357 [details]
Backported upstream fix

dhcp-4.2.5-47.el7 only supports known to be insecure HMAC-MD5 algorhitm for dynamic dns upates. I'd suggest backporting upstream fix which add support for HMAC-SHA1, HMAC-SHA224, HMAC-SHA256, HMAC-SHA384, and HMAC-SHA512.

From e4a2cb79b2679738f56b3803a44c9899f6982c09 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Markwalder <tmark>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 11:41:44 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [v4_2] Addes addtional HMAC TSIG algorithms to DDNS

    Merges in rt36947

Comment 12 Tuomo Soini 2018-01-24 20:35:38 UTC
Fix for Doc Text: "HMAC-MD5" - not MD5.

Comment 13 Ioanna Gkioka 2018-01-25 08:09:46 UTC
Fixed. The Doc text updated. Thanks, Tuono.

Comment 16 errata-xmlrpc 2018-04-10 08:00:52 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:0658


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.