Bug 1398590 - libvirtd doesn't start after reboot even though it's 'enabled'
Summary: libvirtd doesn't start after reboot even though it's 'enabled'
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: xen
Version: 25
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Michael Young
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-11-25 11:15 UTC by Milan Crha
Modified: 2022-07-14 08:27 UTC (History)
26 users (show)

Fixed In Version: xen-4.8.1-7.fc26 xen-4.7.3-4.fc25
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-09-16 03:20:01 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
systemctl --no-pager (26.75 KB, text/plain)
2017-03-27 07:52 UTC, Milan Crha
no flags Details
systemctl list-units --all --no-pager (54.41 KB, text/plain)
2017-03-28 06:27 UTC, Milan Crha
no flags Details
journalctl -b (185.94 KB, text/plain)
2017-06-29 09:25 UTC, Milan Crha
no flags Details
journalctl -b from jlmagee (3.77 MB, text/x-vhdl)
2017-07-16 19:17 UTC, John L Magee
no flags Details
requested libvirtd unit properties from jlmagee (462 bytes, text/plain)
2017-07-16 19:20 UTC, John L Magee
no flags Details

Description Milan Crha 2016-11-25 11:15:24 UTC
Whenever I reboot my machine and log in in the graphical interface I cannot run virtmanager, because it claims the libvirtd is not running. It's right. I can run it manually (as root) and then the virtmanager works like is used to in Fedora 24 before the upgrade of this machine to Fedora 25.

This is quite low in the system for me, thus I asked for a help and I was told to run things like:

  # systemctl reenable libvirtd.service
> Removed /etc/systemd/system/sockets.target.wants/virtlockd.socket.
> Removed /etc/systemd/system/sockets.target.wants/virtlogd.socket.
> Removed /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/libvirtd.service.
> Created symlink /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/libvirtd.service → /usr/lib/systemd/system/libvirtd.service.
> Created symlink /etc/systemd/system/sockets.target.wants/virtlockd.socket → /usr/lib/systemd/system/virtlockd.socket.
> Created symlink /etc/systemd/system/sockets.target.wants/virtlogd.socket → /usr/lib/systemd/system/virtlogd.socket.

And even the status looks fine:
  #  systemctl status libvirtd.service
> ● libvirtd.service - Virtualization daemon
>    Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/libvirtd.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled)
>    Active: inactive (dead)
>      Docs: man:libvirtd(8)
>            http://libvirt.org

but the process is still not running, only when I run it manually (as an old school):
  # service libvirtd start

As I said above, it begun with Fedora 25, the previous Fedora 24 was all fine.

Comment 1 Milan Crha 2016-11-25 11:25:28 UTC
(In reply to Milan Crha from comment #0)
> >    Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/libvirtd.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled)
> >    Active: inactive (dead)

Just in case, this is the status after reboot. What I was referring to as "looks fine" was the "enabled|enabled" on the Loaded line.

Comment 2 Frank Crawford 2016-12-21 12:15:32 UTC
I have also notice this, i.e. libvirtd started automatically under F24, but as soon as I moved to F25 it failed to automatically start on boot, even though it is enabled.

Comment 3 Lin Liu 2017-01-19 07:39:33 UTC
The same issue with libvirt-2.5.0-2.fc26.x86_64 on Fedora rawhide.
Libvirtd.service is inactive after booting when it is enabled. But start it manually after booting is OK.

Comment 4 Milan Crha 2017-01-19 14:26:50 UTC
I was told that maybe Lukas will know, thus CC'ing him. Just in case. Thanks in advance.

Comment 5 Cole Robinson 2017-03-13 22:32:39 UTC
If anyone is still hitting this, please provide the output of this command, after the machine has booted and libvirtd isn't running

  sudo journalctl --boot -u libvirtd.service

Comment 6 Milan Crha 2017-03-22 16:40:14 UTC
Sure, after reboot and login to a desktop environment, then opening a terminal and logging as root I also verified that libvirtd is not running and the output of the command you have is:

   [root@zyxPad mcrha]# ps ax | grep libvirtd
    1710 pts/0    S+     0:00 grep --color=auto libvirtd
   [root@zyxPad mcrha]# journalctl --boot -u libvirtd.service
   -- No entries --

Comment 7 Cole Robinson 2017-03-23 19:22:21 UTC
Milan, indeed that's weird. I'd expect at least some kind of log message in journalctl since the service is listed as 'enabled' . Is there anything in 'journcalctl --boot | grep virt' ? Or maybe just attach the whole 'journalctl --boot' output after a reboot

Comment 8 Milan Crha 2017-03-24 08:27:42 UTC
# journalctl --boot | grep virt
Mar 24 10:25:01 zyxPad kernel: Booting paravirtualized kernel on bare hardware
Mar 24 09:25:13 zyxPad spice-vdagent[1406]: Cannot access vdagent virtio channel /dev/virtio-ports/com.redhat.spice.0

(It was 9:25AM here, not 10:25.)

Comment 10 Cole Robinson 2017-03-24 16:37:54 UTC
(In reply to Milan Crha from comment #8)
> # journalctl --boot | grep virt
> Mar 24 10:25:01 zyxPad kernel: Booting paravirtualized kernel on bare
> hardware
> Mar 24 09:25:13 zyxPad spice-vdagent[1406]: Cannot access vdagent virtio
> channel /dev/virtio-ports/com.redhat.spice.0
> 
> (It was 9:25AM here, not 10:25.)

Hmm, haven't seen this first message before. Do you have xen installed? Not sure if it should make a difference though. Nothing really sticks out from the log though, so more info

Can you also provide output of: 

* systemctl --no-pager
* sudo find /etc -name \*libvirt\*
* sudo rpm -q -V libvirt-daemon

Comment 11 Milan Crha 2017-03-27 07:52:50 UTC
Created attachment 1266577 [details]
systemctl --no-pager

Comment 12 Milan Crha 2017-03-27 07:59:36 UTC
# rpm -qa | grep -i xen
libvirt-daemon-xen-2.2.0-2.fc25.x86_64
jaxen-1.1.6-9.fc25.noarch
xen-hypervisor-4.7.1-9.fc25.x86_64
xen-4.7.1-9.fc25.x86_64
xen-runtime-4.7.1-9.fc25.x86_64
xen-licenses-4.7.1-9.fc25.x86_64
xen-libs-4.7.1-9.fc25.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-xen-2.2.0-2.fc25.x86_64

# find /etc -name \*libvirt\*
/etc/logrotate.d/libvirtd.qemu
/etc/logrotate.d/libvirtd.libxl
/etc/logrotate.d/libvirtd
/etc/sasl2/libvirt.conf
/etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/libvirtd.service
/etc/libvirt
/etc/libvirt/libvirtd.conf
/etc/libvirt/libvirt.conf
/etc/libvirt/libvirt-admin.conf
/etc/sysconfig/libvirt-guests
/etc/sysconfig/libvirtd

# rpm -q -V libvirt-daemon
(nothing)

Still, I can run `systemctl start libvirtd.service` and it starts properly and works. When I do so (run the service manually), the `journalctl --boot -u libvirtd.service` will return something (it returned nothing (-- No entries --) before manual start):

-- Logs begin at Thu 2014-12-04 11:52:14 CET, end at Mon 2017-03-27 09:55:43 CEST. --
Mar 27 09:55:42 zyxPad systemd[1]: Starting Virtualization daemon...
Mar 27 09:55:42 zyxPad systemd[1]: Started Virtualization daemon.
Mar 27 09:55:43 zyxPad dnsmasq[4009]: started, version 2.76 cachesize 150
Mar 27 09:55:43 zyxPad dnsmasq[4009]: compile time options: IPv6 GNU-getopt DBus no-i18n IDN DHCP DHCPv6 no-Lua TFTP no-conntrack ipset auth DNSSEC loop-detect inotify
Mar 27 09:55:43 zyxPad dnsmasq-dhcp[4009]: DHCP, IP range 192.168.122.2 -- 192.168.122.254, lease time 1h
Mar 27 09:55:43 zyxPad dnsmasq-dhcp[4009]: DHCP, sockets bound exclusively to interface virbr0
Mar 27 09:55:43 zyxPad dnsmasq[4009]: reading /etc/resolv.conf
Mar 27 09:55:43 zyxPad dnsmasq[4009]: using nameserver 10.38.5.26#53
Mar 27 09:55:43 zyxPad dnsmasq[4009]: using nameserver 10.35.255.14#53
Mar 27 09:55:43 zyxPad dnsmasq[4009]: using nameserver 10.0.0.138#53
Mar 27 09:55:43 zyxPad dnsmasq[4009]: read /etc/hosts - 5 addresses
Mar 27 09:55:43 zyxPad dnsmasq[4009]: read /var/lib/libvirt/dnsmasq/default.addnhosts - 0 addresses
Mar 27 09:55:43 zyxPad dnsmasq-dhcp[4009]: read /var/lib/libvirt/dnsmasq/default.hostsfile

Some of the nameserver-s are for VPN, which is currently active.

Just in case you might find this useful (even you did not ask for it):
# rpm -qa | grep libvirt | sort
libvirt-client-2.2.0-2.fc25.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-2.2.0-2.fc25.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-config-network-2.2.0-2.fc25.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-interface-2.2.0-2.fc25.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-libxl-2.2.0-2.fc25.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-network-2.2.0-2.fc25.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-nodedev-2.2.0-2.fc25.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-nwfilter-2.2.0-2.fc25.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-qemu-2.2.0-2.fc25.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-secret-2.2.0-2.fc25.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-2.2.0-2.fc25.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-xen-2.2.0-2.fc25.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-kvm-2.2.0-2.fc25.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-qemu-2.2.0-2.fc25.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-xen-2.2.0-2.fc25.x86_64
libvirt-gconfig-1.0.0-1.fc25.x86_64
libvirt-glib-1.0.0-1.fc25.x86_64
libvirt-gobject-1.0.0-1.fc25.x86_64
libvirt-libs-2.2.0-2.fc25.x86_64
libvirt-python-2.2.0-1.fc25.x86_64

Comment 13 Cole Robinson 2017-03-27 21:11:41 UTC
Hmm didn't realize plain systemctl output is incomplete. Can you also provide:

  systemctl list-units --all --no-pager

Comment 14 Milan Crha 2017-03-28 06:27:52 UTC
Created attachment 1266841 [details]
systemctl list-units --all --no-pager

Comment 15 Cole Robinson 2017-03-28 17:19:10 UTC
Okay I don't really know what's going or what more to check for. Reassigning to systemd mostly for feedback from maintainers over there

systemd folks, user has libvirtd.service enabled, but it doesn't seem to even attempt to start at boot, nothing in journalctl --boot to indicate it that I can see, but when user manually does 'systemctl start libvirtd.service' everything works fine. ideas about what could be causing this/what to check for?

Comment 16 Allan Poulsen 2017-06-15 10:49:27 UTC
Could someone please escalate this with the systemd people? It happens continuously on my system. I wonder why the libvirtd.service depends on the apparmor.service even though that doesn't exist on a Fedora system?

Comment 17 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2017-06-16 01:23:05 UTC
Sorry for the delay.

>  I wonder why the libvirtd.service depends on the apparmor.service even though that doesn't exist on a Fedora system?

At least one easy question: it doesn't. It is only specified to start after apparmor.service it was installed (and part of the initial transaction).

And now the the original issue: after a reboot, before starting libvirtd.service manually, please paste the output of:
  systemctl show -p State,WantedBy,RequiredBy,After,Before,PartOf,Conflicts,ActiveState,SubState,LoadState libvirtd

Comment 18 Milan Crha 2017-06-16 07:34:31 UTC
> please paste the output of:
> ...

Property State does not exist.
PartOf=
RequiredBy=
WantedBy=multi-user.target
Conflicts=shutdown.target
Before=shutdown.target libvirt-guests.service multi-user.target
After=iscsid.service remote-fs.target system.slice dbus.service local-fs.target network.target sysinit.target basic.target apparmor.service xenstored.service systemd-journald.socket
LoadState=loaded
ActiveState=inactive
SubState=dead

Comment 19 Allan Poulsen 2017-06-16 07:52:25 UTC
I agree with Milan Crha - I get the same output:

% LC_ALL=C sudo systemctl show -p State,WantedBy,RequiredBy,After,Before,PartOf,Conflicts,ActiveState,SubState,LoadState libvirtd
Property State does not exist.
PartOf=
RequiredBy=
WantedBy=multi-user.target
Conflicts=shutdown.target
Before=libvirt-guests.service multi-user.target shutdown.target
After=sysinit.target dbus.service iscsid.service virtlogd.socket system.slice xenstored.service remote-fs.target systemd-journald.socket network.target local-fs.target apparmor.service basic.target virtlogd.service
LoadState=loaded
ActiveState=inactive
SubState=dead

Comment 20 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2017-06-16 14:45:04 UTC
Hm, can one of you please boot with 'systemd.log-level=debug' on the kernel command line and attach the whole 'journalctl -b' output. Thanks.

Comment 21 Milan Crha 2017-06-19 09:23:51 UTC
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #20)
> Hm, can one of you please boot with 'systemd.log-level=debug' on the kernel
> command line

I'm sorry, but how do you do that these days, please? Just by editing the boot line in grub? Also, the whole journalctl log contains some information I consider private (like MAC addresses, WiFi networks and so on). How to strip them easily, without wasting an hour on it?

Comment 22 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2017-06-22 17:02:29 UTC
It's probably better to just edit the command line in the grub menu. That only affects a single boot.

There's no automatic way to filter stuff afaik.

Comment 23 Milan Crha 2017-06-29 09:25:21 UTC
Created attachment 1292821 [details]
journalctl -b

I'm not sure if I did it right, I expected longer log, but here you are.

Comment 24 John L Magee 2017-07-16 19:17:55 UTC
Created attachment 1299447 [details]
journalctl -b from jlmagee

shortly after boot

Comment 25 John L Magee 2017-07-16 19:20:09 UTC
Created attachment 1299448 [details]
requested libvirtd unit properties from jlmagee

Comment 26 John L Magee 2017-07-16 19:24:41 UTC
added attachments for items requested earlier in thread

This is a fully update F26 with virt-preview. I do not think is has anything to do with apparmor. It is whatever causes the "conflicted_by=yes" below but I haven't figured out a way to debug the cause of that.


systemctl status libvirtd.service
● libvirtd.service - Virtualization daemon
   Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/libvirtd.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled)
   Active: inactive (dead)
     Docs: man:libvirtd(8)
           http://libvirt.org

Jul 16 15:06:20 mnetjlm7.mageenet.net systemd[1]: libvirtd.service: Looking at job libvirtd.service/stop conflicted_by=yes
Jul 16 15:06:20 mnetjlm7.mageenet.net systemd[1]: libvirtd.service: Looking at job libvirtd.service/start conflicted_by=no
Jul 16 15:06:20 mnetjlm7.mageenet.net systemd[1]: libvirtd.service: Fixing conflicting jobs libvirtd.service/stop,libvirtd.service/start by deleting job libvirtd.service/start

Comment 27 Cole Robinson 2017-08-06 20:13:32 UTC
zbyszek, please check John's output above when you get a moment

Comment 28 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2017-08-08 04:43:23 UTC
Hmm, so the issue is that some other service has Conflicts=libvirtd.service, and when they are both pulled in,
libvirtd.service/start job gets kicked from the transaction.

For example, I have a machine with chronyd.service and systemd-timesyncd.service both enabled, and during boot I get:
Aug 08 00:14:43 rawhide systemd[1]: Pulling in systemd-timesyncd.service/start from sysinit.target/start
Aug 08 00:14:43 rawhide systemd[1]: Pulling in chronyd.service/stop from systemd-timesyncd.service/start
Aug 08 00:14:43 rawhide systemd[1]: Pulling in systemd-timesyncd.service/stop from chronyd.service/start
Aug 08 00:14:43 rawhide systemd[1]: Pulling in chronyd.service/start from multi-user.target/start
Aug 08 00:15:03 rawhide systemd[1]: chronyd.service: chronyd.service/stop would change existing job.
Aug 08 00:15:03 rawhide systemd[1]: chronyd.service: Deleting chronyd.service/stop to minimize impact.
so it's essentially pseudo-random which service will win.

Something similar happens in the case of libvirt, with the unfortunate consequence that libvirtd.service/start
gets kicked out.

Unfortunately systemd's reporting is really bad (logs above are from patched systemd, and
vanilla systemd prints nothing useful.)
One of the problems is that even though Conflicts is symmetrical, it is *not* reported
in the conflicted unit, only in the one that declares the conflict. So it's not possible
to just look at libvirtd.service, it is necessary to guess what is the conflicting unit.
I'll take this upstream to improve the debug logs for this.

Hah, but I think I found the culprit:
/usr/lib/systemd/system/xendomains.service:
Conflicts=libvirtd.service

OK, so maybe I was overly critical, the answer is right there in the logs:
Jul 16 15:06:20 mnetjlm7.mageenet.net systemd[1]: xendomains.service: Looking at job xendomains.service/start conflicted_by=no
Jul 16 15:06:20 mnetjlm7.mageenet.net systemd[1]: xendomains.service: Looking at job xendomains.service/stop conflicted_by=no
Jul 16 15:06:20 mnetjlm7.mageenet.net systemd[1]: xendomains.service: Fixing conflicting jobs xendomains.service/start,xendomains.service/stop by deleting job xendomains.service/stop
Jul 16 15:06:20 mnetjlm7.mageenet.net systemd[1]: libvirtd.service: Looking at job libvirtd.service/stop conflicted_by=yes
Jul 16 15:06:20 mnetjlm7.mageenet.net systemd[1]: libvirtd.service: Looking at job libvirtd.service/start conflicted_by=no
Jul 16 15:06:20 mnetjlm7.mageenet.net systemd[1]: libvirtd.service: Fixing conflicting jobs libvirtd.service/stop,libvirtd.service/start by deleting job libvirtd.service/start

This seems to be a bug in xendomains.service, I don't it has any business in preventing libvirtd.service
from running.

Tentatively reassiging to xen.

--

@xen maintainers: tl;dr version:

/usr/lib/systemd/system/xendomains.service has Conflicts=libvirtd.service which prevents libvirtd.service
from running in the initial transaction, which makes people unhappy.

This most likely affects F25-rawhide.

Comment 29 Cole Robinson 2017-08-08 13:24:25 UTC
Thank you zbyszek!

Looks like the xen commit that added the Conflicts line is:

commit b38a310f9f21d95f98d3cce915787c34cb5f727c
Author: Olaf Hering <olaf>
Date:   Thu Oct 29 11:02:54 2015 +0000

    tools/hotplug: xendomains.service conflicts with libvirt
    
    xendomains will manage guests behind libvirts back:
    - libvirt starts a guest
    - that guest can be "managed" by libvirt and xl at the same time
    - when xendomains runs on shutdown it will save the guest using xl
      libvirt does not know about this
    - when xendomains runs on boot it will restore the saved guest using xl
      libvirt does not know about this, it will just fail to manage the
      restored guest
    
    To prevent xendomains from interfering with libvirt add a Conflicts= to
    xendomains.service. It will cause libvirt to be stopped if xendomains is
    started manually with 'systemctl start'.

Comment 30 Cole Robinson 2017-08-08 13:31:28 UTC
Milan/Allan/John can you guys confirm that xendomains service is enabled? If you want to use libvirt tools the equivalent service is libvirt-guests

Though it would be nice if systemd gave hints in non-debug 'systemctl status' output that libvirt didn't start on boot due to a conflict

Comment 31 Allan Poulsen 2017-08-09 08:08:31 UTC
Yup it is enabled - there was nothing in the release notes regarding xen not being able to co-exist on the system.

systemctl status xendomains.service
● xendomains.service - Xendomains - start and stop guests on boot and shutdown
   Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/xendomains.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled)
   Active: inactive (dead)
Condition: start condition failed at ons 2017-08-09 09:46:48 CEST; 20min ago
           └─ ConditionPathExists=/proc/xen/capabilities was not met

Comment 32 Allan Poulsen 2017-08-09 09:55:44 UTC
I can also confirm disabling xendomains will make libvirtd start correctly on reboot.

● xendomains.service - Xendomains - start and stop guests on boot and shutdown
   Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/xendomains.service; disabled; vendor preset: enabled)
   Active: inactive (dead)

● libvirtd.service - Virtualization daemon
   Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/libvirtd.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled)
   Active: active (running) since ons 2017-08-09 11:49:38 CEST; 3min 58s ago
     Docs: man:libvirtd(8)
           http://libvirt.org
 Main PID: 1491 (libvirtd)
    Tasks: 23 (limit: 4915)
   Memory: 62.6M
      CPU: 2.076s
   CGroup: /system.slice/libvirtd.service
           ├─1491 /usr/sbin/libvirtd
           ├─3267 /sbin/dnsmasq --conf-file=/var/lib/libvirt/dnsmasq/default.conf --leasefile-ro --dhcp-script=/usr/libexec/libvirt_leaseshelper
           └─3268 /sbin/dnsmasq --conf-file=/var/lib/libvirt/dnsmasq/default.conf --leasefile-ro --dhcp-script=/usr/libexec/libvirt_leaseshelper

Comment 33 Milan Crha 2017-08-21 17:33:41 UTC
(In reply to Cole Robinson from comment #30)
> Milan/Allan/John can you guys confirm that xendomains service is enabled? If
> you want to use libvirt tools the equivalent service is libvirt-guests

Mine looks similarly as comment #31. Disabling it with:
   $ systemctl disable xendomains.service

and after restart libvirtd service runs again, as expected. I'll keep xendomains.service disabled now.

Comment 34 Fedora Update System 2017-08-23 22:54:49 UTC
xen-4.8.1-7.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-b8fa8e1a13

Comment 35 Fedora Update System 2017-08-24 04:49:57 UTC
xen-4.8.1-7.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-b8fa8e1a13

Comment 36 Fedora Update System 2017-08-24 22:57:47 UTC
xen-4.7.3-3.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-978bebe3a7

Comment 37 Fedora Update System 2017-08-26 19:54:01 UTC
xen-4.8.1-7.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 38 Fedora Update System 2017-08-26 22:33:18 UTC
xen-4.7.3-3.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-978bebe3a7

Comment 39 Fedora Update System 2017-08-30 23:12:50 UTC
xen-4.7.3-4.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ed735463e3

Comment 40 Fedora Update System 2017-09-01 12:54:48 UTC
xen-4.7.3-4.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ed735463e3

Comment 41 Fedora Update System 2017-09-16 03:20:01 UTC
xen-4.7.3-4.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.