Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1399577

Summary: [3.4] dnsmasq should not set strict-order
Product: OpenShift Container Platform Reporter: Johnny Liu <jialiu>
Component: InstallerAssignee: Scott Dodson <sdodson>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Johnny Liu <jialiu>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 3.4.0CC: aos-bugs, ghuang, javier.ramirez, jialiu, jokerman, mmccomas, wmeng
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Previously the dnsmasq configuration included "strict-order" which meant that dnsmasq would iterate through the host's nameservers in order. This meant that if the first nameserver had failed a lengthy timeout is observed while dnsmasq waits before moving on to the next nameserver. By removing the strict-order option dnsmasq will prefer nameservers that it knows to be up over those which are unresponsive ensuring faster name resolution. If you wish add this or any other option please use the advanced installer option 'openshift_node_dnsmasq_additional_config_file' which allows you to provide the path to a dnsmasq configuration file that will be deployed on all nodes.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 1400130 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-01-18 12:56:10 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1400130, 1400139, 1400686    

Comment 6 Scott Dodson 2016-11-30 13:39:30 UTC
*** Bug 1399756 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 10 Johnny Liu 2016-12-05 06:49:32 UTC
Waiting to get errata puddle including the fix PR.

Comment 11 Johnny Liu 2016-12-07 10:39:46 UTC
Verified this bug with openshift-ansible-3.4.35-1.git.0.2e13650.el7, and PASS.

After installation, check:
# cat /etc/dnsmasq.d/origin-dns.conf 
no-resolv
domain-needed
server=/cluster.local/172.30.0.1

# cat /etc/dnsmasq.d/origin-upstream-dns.conf 
server=192.168.2.2
server=10.11.11.11


All the dns could be resolved by both 192.168.2.2 and 10.11.11.11.

Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2017-01-18 12:56:10 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:0066