Bug 1399585 - python-genshi: Missing "python2-<module>" provides
Summary: python-genshi: Missing "python2-<module>" provides
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: python-genshi
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Felix Schwarz
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-11-29 10:44 UTC by Charalampos Stratakis
Modified: 2017-01-02 10:30 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-12-26 19:26:40 UTC
Type: Bug


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Charalampos Stratakis 2016-11-29 10:44:09 UTC
This package does not provide "python2-<module>".

As per Python packaging guidelines [0],the package must provide:
"python2-foo" for Python 2
"python-foo" for the system default Python (currently 2, but this might
change in the future)

Please use the %python_provide macro [1] to specify the correct provides.

It's fine to do this in Rawhide only.


If anything is unclear, or if you need any kind of assistance with this
issue, you can ask on IRC (#fedora-python on Freenode), or reply here.
We'll be happy to help!


[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#The_.25python_provide_macro

Comment 1 Felix Schwarz 2016-12-25 23:54:53 UTC
started https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=829322

Comment 2 Felix Schwarz 2016-12-26 19:26:40 UTC
Build successful so I think this should be fixed.

As I had only little Fedora time in the recent past I'd be glad if someone could verify that my changes bring the python-genshi package back into compliance with the python2/python3 changes ( http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/python-genshi.git/commit/?id=dfc36a4f0a64396860d4c53a14fe8e8858dd0f35 ).

Comment 3 Charalampos Stratakis 2017-01-02 10:30:45 UTC
Hi Felix,

Yes the package seems to have the proper provides now.

Thanks for addressing that.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.