Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1403219

Summary: We can not add host from ovirt-engine (oVirt 3.6)
Product: [oVirt] ovirt-engine Reporter: aygul
Component: Host-DeployAssignee: Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Pavel Stehlik <pstehlik>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 3.6.6CC: aygul, bugs, michal.skrivanek
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-12-13 09:29:49 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: Node RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
libvirt-sanlock error
none
repo log file none

Description aygul 2016-12-09 12:58:07 UTC
Created attachment 1229958 [details]
libvirt-sanlock error

Description of problem:

We can not add host from ovirt-engine.While we add host we had an error.I attached the error message.Setted up 6.5 Centos and 3.6 ovirt on this server.I m trying to add host which is had Red-Hat 6.7.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

oVirt 3.6

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:

1.İnstall CEntos 6.5
2.İnstall ovirt-engine onto Centos 6.5
3.Try to add host a running which had Red-Hat 6.7 via ovirt-engine
Actual results:

Red-hat 6.7 host have to add on oVirt 


Expected results:

it should be configure as a node on ovirt

Additional info:

Comment 1 Michal Skrivanek 2016-12-10 08:06:24 UTC
Please share repo/channel configuration on the RHEL host

Comment 2 aygul 2016-12-10 09:47:49 UTC
Created attachment 1230239 [details]
repo log file

Hi ,

I added repo/chanel configuration.

Thanks,

Best Regards.

Comment 3 Michal Skrivanek 2016-12-10 12:29:30 UTC
Sanlock should be in RHEL Optional channel. Add that one as well in addition to base channel. 
You can check if it resolves correctly by tryng "yum install vdsm" on the host

Comment 4 aygul 2016-12-10 13:53:02 UTC
Hi,

I tryed to run "yum install vdsm" but i had this error.

--> Processing Dependency: sanlock >= 2.8 for package: vdsm-4.16.20-1.git3a90f62.el6.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: sanlock-python for package: vdsm-4.16.20-1.git3a90f62.el6.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: libvirt-lock-sanlock for package: vdsm-4.16.20-1.git3a90f62.el6.x86_64
---> Package vdsm-yajsonrpc.noarch 0:4.16.20-1.git3a90f62.el6 will be installed
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package: vdsm-4.16.20-1.git3a90f62.el6.x86_64 (epel)
           Requires: sanlock-python
Error: Package: vdsm-4.16.20-1.git3a90f62.el6.x86_64 (epel)
           Requires: sanlock >= 2.8
Error: Package: vdsm-4.16.20-1.git3a90f62.el6.x86_64 (epel)
           Requires: libvirt-lock-sanlock
 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
 You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
[root@wvm-host9 ~]#

I tryed to "yum install vdsm--skip-broken" command but it not solve the problem

Thanks,

Best Regards.

Comment 5 aygul 2016-12-13 07:04:08 UTC
Hi,

Kindly Reminder.

Best Regards,

Stefan.

Comment 6 Sandro Bonazzola 2016-12-13 09:29:49 UTC
I'm closing this bug as end of life. 3.6 is not supported anymore. Please update to 4.0 and open a new bug against it if you still have issues.
About comment #4 please exclude vdsm from epel repo since epel version of vdsm is broken.