Bug 1403325 - [RFE] Topology View update with large number of Objects
Summary: [RFE] Topology View update with large number of Objects
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1388411
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine
Classification: Red Hat
Component: UI - OPS
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: GA
: cfme-future
Assignee: John Hardy
QA Contact: Dave Johnson
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-12-09 16:26 UTC by Loic Avenel
Modified: 2017-05-08 19:20 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-05-08 19:20:42 UTC
Category: ---
Cloudforms Team: ---
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Loic Avenel 2016-12-09 16:26:10 UTC 
Description of problem: with large OpenShift installation, Topology view is unusable there are two many objects on the screen.. 
There are 2 things we should look at:

 - Limit the number of objects in Topology view when more than X objets... Limit the tree depth.. and offer drill drown
 - A some object level: Nodes, Projects, Containers etc... enable topology view to see all childs and parents of this object.. 


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ANY


How reproducible: ALWAYS
Comment 2 Federico Simoncelli 2016-12-12 15:57:56 UTC 
Adding Ari to the CC who is also aware of this requirement and he was evaluating the CM side.
Comment 3 Ari Zellner 2017-01-19 13:09:31 UTC 
Upstram PR: https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/pull/95
Comment 4 Ari Zellner 2017-01-29 13:27:35 UTC 
Here is an upstream issue tracking this change for all topology views: https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/issues/252
Comment 6 Federico Simoncelli 2017-04-10 14:38:06 UTC 
Loic, is this a duplicate of bug 1388411 ?
Comment 7 Loic Avenel 2017-05-01 11:20:11 UTC 
(In reply to Federico Simoncelli from comment #6)
> Loic, is this a duplicate of bug 1388411 ?

YES
Comment 8 Federico Simoncelli 2017-05-08 19:20:42 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1388411 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.