+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1404573 +++ Description of problem: https://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/1624/consoleText ================================================================================ [13:51:48] Running tests in file ./tests/bugs/snapshot/bug-1316437.t ./tests/bugs/snapshot/bug-1316437.t .. 1..7 ok 1, LINENUM:9 ok 2, LINENUM:13 ok 3, LINENUM:15 ok 4, LINENUM:17 ok 5, LINENUM:19 not ok 6 , LINENUM:24 FAILED COMMAND: ! [ 14775 -gt 0 ] ok 7, LINENUM:28 Failed 1/7 subtests Test Summary Report ------------------- ./tests/bugs/snapshot/bug-1316437.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 7 Failed: 1) Failed test: 6 Files=1, Tests=7, 22 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 2.44 cusr 1.55 csys = 4.02 CPU) Result: FAIL End of test ./tests/bugs/snapshot/bug-1316437.t ================================================================================ Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: --- Additional comment from Worker Ant on 2016-12-16 04:08:49 EST --- REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/16162 (tests: Fix spurious test failure in bug-1316437.t) posted (#1) for review on master by Rajesh Joseph (rjoseph) --- Additional comment from Worker Ant on 2016-12-16 09:36:49 EST --- COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/16162 committed in master by Rajesh Joseph (rjoseph) ------ commit e9d8525a0d34130ba2a582109937b8e79eecf6ab Author: Rajesh Joseph <rjoseph> Date: Thu Dec 15 20:51:30 2016 +0530 tests: Fix spurious test failure in bug-1316437.t After sending SIGTERM to gluster process we immediately check if process exited. We should wait for some time before checking process state. BUG: 1404573 Change-Id: Iaba0067f6e880a7fe38e11b9fa0fe9bd103b19e2 Signed-off-by: Rajesh Joseph <rjoseph> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/16162 Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> Reviewed-by: Avra Sengupta <asengupt> NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org> Reviewed-by: N Balachandran <nbalacha> CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org>
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/16164 (tests: Fix spurious test failure in bug-1316437.t) posted (#1) for review on release-3.8 by Rajesh Joseph (rjoseph)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/16164 (tests: Fix spurious test failure in bug-1316437.t) posted (#2) for review on release-3.8 by Rajesh Joseph (rjoseph)
COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/16164 committed in release-3.8 by Rajesh Joseph (rjoseph) ------ commit e5e9de4bd7c0b9421de5095207a58b9372b1bd7d Author: Rajesh Joseph <rjoseph> Date: Thu Dec 15 20:51:30 2016 +0530 tests: Fix spurious test failure in bug-1316437.t After sending SIGTERM to gluster process we immediately check if process exited. We should wait for some time before checking process state. > Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/16162 > Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> > Reviewed-by: Avra Sengupta <asengupt> > NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org> > Reviewed-by: N Balachandran <nbalacha> > CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> (cherry picked from commit e9d8525a0d34130ba2a582109937b8e79eecf6ab) BUG: 1405450 Change-Id: Iaba0067f6e880a7fe38e11b9fa0fe9bd103b19e2 Signed-off-by: Rajesh Joseph <rjoseph> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/16164 Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org> CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> Reviewed-by: Avra Sengupta <asengupt>
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/16264 (tests: Fix spurious test failure in bug-1316437.t) posted (#1) for review on release-3.8-fb by Kevin Vigor (kvigor)
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.8.8, please open a new bug report. glusterfs-3.8.8 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution. [1] https://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/announce/2017-January/000064.html [2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/