"The following packages that were shipped in RHV 4.0 will need naming updates for 4.1 to be consistent with the branding changes introduced in 4.0 ('Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization'->'Red Hat Virtualization') rhevm-spice-client-x64-msi-4.0-2.el7ev.noarch.rpm rhevm-spice-client-x86-msi-4.0-2.el7ev.noarch.rpm Simply remove the 'e' for 4.1 package."
(In reply to Bronce McClain from comment #0) > "The following packages that were shipped in RHV 4.0 will need naming > updates for 4.1 to be consistent with the branding changes introduced in 4.0 > ('Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization'->'Red Hat Virtualization') > > rhevm-spice-client-x64-msi-4.0-2.el7ev.noarch.rpm > rhevm-spice-client-x86-msi-4.0-2.el7ev.noarch.rpm > > Simply remove the 'e' for 4.1 package." Hi Bronce, Are there plans to rename the product and some components in BZ as well? And when? Thanks, David
(In reply to David Blechter from comment #1) > (In reply to Bronce McClain from comment #0) > > "The following packages that were shipped in RHV 4.0 will need naming > > updates for 4.1 to be consistent with the branding changes introduced in 4.0 > > ('Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization'->'Red Hat Virtualization') > > > > rhevm-spice-client-x64-msi-4.0-2.el7ev.noarch.rpm > > rhevm-spice-client-x86-msi-4.0-2.el7ev.noarch.rpm > > > > Simply remove the 'e' for 4.1 package." > > Hi Bronce, > Are there plans to rename the product and some components in BZ as well? > And when? > Thanks, David There are plans, but I'm not sure the target. It won't happen prior to 4.1, I'd like to target that for 4.2. Of course, it's not necessarily release driven, but to ensure the flags and everything map to errata correctly I think it should be done prior to 4.2 RCM setup.
(In reply to Bronce McClain from comment #2) > (In reply to David Blechter from comment #1) > > (In reply to Bronce McClain from comment #0) > > > "The following packages that were shipped in RHV 4.0 will need naming > > > updates for 4.1 to be consistent with the branding changes introduced in 4.0 > > > ('Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization'->'Red Hat Virtualization') > > > > > > rhevm-spice-client-x64-msi-4.0-2.el7ev.noarch.rpm > > > rhevm-spice-client-x86-msi-4.0-2.el7ev.noarch.rpm > > > > > > Simply remove the 'e' for 4.1 package." > > > > Hi Bronce, > > Are there plans to rename the product and some components in BZ as well? > > And when? > > Thanks, David > > There are plans, but I'm not sure the target. It won't happen prior to 4.1, > I'd like to target that for 4.2. Of course, it's not necessarily release > driven, but to ensure the flags and everything map to errata correctly I > think it should be done prior to 4.2 RCM setup. Bronce, thanks for update, I suggest the better solution by removing "rhevm" at all from the package name, as the windows client can be used outside of the rhvm as well, so it will be "spice-client ...." And it will be consistent with all spice packages in RHVM as well as in RHEL. We can also change this BZ title to "ReBranding: Change Spice Packaging name by removing 'rhev' from the name" Thanks, David
(In reply to David Blechter from comment #3) > (In reply to Bronce McClain from comment #2) > > (In reply to David Blechter from comment #1) > > > (In reply to Bronce McClain from comment #0) > > > > "The following packages that were shipped in RHV 4.0 will need naming > > > > updates for 4.1 to be consistent with the branding changes introduced in 4.0 > > > > ('Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization'->'Red Hat Virtualization') > > > > > > > > rhevm-spice-client-x64-msi-4.0-2.el7ev.noarch.rpm > > > > rhevm-spice-client-x86-msi-4.0-2.el7ev.noarch.rpm > > > > > > > > Simply remove the 'e' for 4.1 package." > > > > > > Hi Bronce, > > > Are there plans to rename the product and some components in BZ as well? > > > And when? > > > Thanks, David > > > > There are plans, but I'm not sure the target. It won't happen prior to 4.1, > > I'd like to target that for 4.2. Of course, it's not necessarily release > > driven, but to ensure the flags and everything map to errata correctly I > > think it should be done prior to 4.2 RCM setup. > > Bronce, > thanks for update, > > I suggest the better solution by removing "rhevm" at all from the package > name, as the windows client can be used outside of the rhvm as well, so it > will be "spice-client ...." > And it will be consistent with all spice packages in RHVM as well as in RHEL. > > We can also change this BZ title to "ReBranding: Change Spice Packaging name > by removing 'rhev' from the name" > > Thanks, David That makes sense to me, David.
rhevm-4.0.6 -> rhevm-4.1 is failing on spice-client not correctly obsoleting rhevm-spice-client-x86-msi-4.1-2.el7ev.noarch Dependencies Resolved ======================================================================================================== Package Arch Version Repository Size ======================================================================================================== Updating: ovirt-engine noarch 4.1.0.3-0.1.el7 rhv-4.1.0-11 2.1 M ovirt-engine-backend noarch 4.1.0.3-0.1.el7 rhv-4.1.0-11 6.2 M ovirt-engine-dashboard x86_64 1.1.0-1.el7ev rhv-4.1.0-11 3.1 M ovirt-engine-dbscripts noarch 4.1.0.3-0.1.el7 rhv-4.1.0-11 260 k ovirt-engine-dwh noarch 4.1.0-1.el7ev rhv-4.1.0-11 2.1 M ovirt-engine-restapi noarch 4.1.0.3-0.1.el7 rhv-4.1.0-11 4.9 M ovirt-engine-tools noarch 4.1.0.3-0.1.el7 rhv-4.1.0-11 234 k ovirt-engine-tools-backup noarch 4.1.0.3-0.1.el7 rhv-4.1.0-11 22 k ovirt-engine-userportal noarch 4.1.0.3-0.1.el7 rhv-4.1.0-11 57 M ovirt-engine-webadmin-portal noarch 4.1.0.3-0.1.el7 rhv-4.1.0-11 96 M redhat-support-plugin-rhev noarch 4.1.0-1.el7 rhv-4.1.0-11 9.7 k rhevm noarch 4.1.0.3-0.1.el7 rhv-4.1.0-11 2.3 k Installing for dependencies: ansible noarch 2.2.0.0-1.el7 rhv-4.1.0-11 4.5 M ovirt-engine-hosts-ansible-inventory noarch 4.1.0.3-0.1.el7 rhv-4.1.0-11 29 k ovirt-web-ui x86_64 0.1.1-2.el7ev rhv-4.1.0-11 1.9 M python-httplib2 noarch 0.9.1-2.1.el7 rhv-4.1.0-11 114 k python-keyczar noarch 0.71c-2.el7 rhv-4.1.0-11 217 k python2-passlib noarch 1.6.5-1.el7 rhv-4.1.0-11 487 k python2-pyasn1 noarch 0.1.9-7.el7 rhel-7-server-rpms 100 k spice-client-msi-x64 noarch 4.1-4.el7ev rhv-4.1.0-11 44 M spice-client-msi-x86 noarch 4.1-4.el7ev rhv-4.1.0-11 42 M sshpass x86_64 1.05-5.el7 rhv-4.1.0-11 20 k Transaction Summary ======================================================================================================== Install ( 10 Dependent packages) Upgrade 12 Packages Total size: 265 M Is this ok [y/d/N]: y Downloading packages: Running transaction check Running transaction test Transaction check error: file /usr/share/spice/SpiceVersion_x64.txt from install of spice-client-msi-x64-4.1-4.el7ev.noarch conflicts with file from package rhevm-spice-client-x64-msi-4.1-2.el7ev.noarch file /usr/share/spice/usbdk-x64.msi from install of spice-client-msi-x64-4.1-4.el7ev.noarch conflicts with file from package rhevm-spice-client-x64-msi-4.1-2.el7ev.noarch file /usr/share/spice/virt-viewer-x64.msi from install of spice-client-msi-x64-4.1-4.el7ev.noarch conflicts with file from package rhevm-spice-client-x64-msi-4.1-2.el7ev.noarch file /usr/share/spice/SpiceVersion.txt from install of spice-client-msi-x86-4.1-4.el7ev.noarch conflicts with file from package rhevm-spice-client-x86-msi-4.1-2.el7ev.noarch file /usr/share/spice/usbdk-x86.msi from install of spice-client-msi-x86-4.1-4.el7ev.noarch conflicts with file from package rhevm-spice-client-x86-msi-4.1-2.el7ev.noarch file /usr/share/spice/virt-viewer-x86.msi from install of spice-client-msi-x86-4.1-4.el7ev.noarch conflicts with file from package rhevm-spice-client-x86-msi-4.1-2.el7ev.noarch
Please remove rhevm from Provides rows: +Provides: spice-client-x86-msi +Obsoletes: rhevm-spice-client-x86-msi <= 4.1-2
(In reply to Pavol Brilla from comment #10) > Please remove rhevm from Provides rows: > > +Provides: spice-client-x86-msi > +Obsoletes: rhevm-spice-client-x86-msi <= 4.1-2 Uri any plan to fixing this failedQA issue? Thanks -Tom
(In reply to Pavol Brilla from comment #10) > Please remove rhevm from Provides rows: > > +Provides: spice-client-x86-msi > +Obsoletes: rhevm-spice-client-x86-msi <= 4.1-2 Actually the problem is that the rhevm-spice-client version is larger than 4.1-2 due to %{dist}. What's needed is to obsolete < 4.1.3
Created attachment 1248653 [details] Fix Obsoletes rhevm-spice-client
Hi Uri. Could you please set the requires_doc_text flag to - if no doc text is required, or ? if text should appear in the advisory. Then add the text to Doc Text field. Thanks.