Spec URL: https://gist.githubusercontent.com/robled/c3a7667e5f64763bb62e39ff76ea6636/raw/4137ec8778119ebaa9fe71ba847f1eee32a8e5a3/python-kaptan.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/robled/python-kaptan/fedora-25-x86_64/00490590-python-kaptan/python-kaptan-0.5.5-1.fc25.src.rpm Description: configuration parser Fedora Account System Username: robled This is my first package and I need a sponsor. Successful Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16935595
This looks perfect, nice work! This package is approved, and I will now sponsor you! Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Cannot run licensecheck: Command 'licensecheck -r /var/lib/mock /fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/builddir/build/BUILD/kaptan-0.5.5' returned non-zero exit status 255 [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python2-kaptan , python3-kaptan randy: Not needed. [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see attached diff). See: (this test has no URL) [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). Rpmlint ------- Checking: python2-kaptan-0.5.5-1.fc26.noarch.rpm python3-kaptan-0.5.5-1.fc26.noarch.rpm python-kaptan-0.5.5-1.fc26.src.rpm python3-kaptan.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary kaptan 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- python3-kaptan.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary kaptan 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Diff spec file in url and in SRPM --------------------------------- --- /home/rbarlow/reviews/1405742-python-kaptan/srpm/python-kaptan.spec 2016-12-17 21:08:49.631319771 -0500 +++ /home/rbarlow/reviews/1405742-python-kaptan/srpm-unpacked/python-kaptan.spec 2016-12-17 19:41:21.000000000 -0500 @@ -70,3 +70,3 @@ %changelog * Sat Dec 17 2016 David Roble <robled> 0.5.5-1 -- Initial release \ No newline at end of file +- Initial release Requires -------- python3-kaptan (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/python3 python(abi) python2-kaptan (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python(abi) Provides -------- python3-kaptan: python3-kaptan python3.5dist(kaptan) python3dist(kaptan) python2-kaptan: python-kaptan python2-kaptan python2.7dist(kaptan) python2dist(kaptan) Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/emre/kaptan/archive/0.5.5.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 4f09cf5cbcf197700d89d1921f35e23c74b4aacab4b8c63b414a9b9ff60dd668 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 4f09cf5cbcf197700d89d1921f35e23c74b4aacab4b8c63b414a9b9ff60dd668 Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1405742 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6
There used to be a requirement to do a few practice reviews to get sponsored, but that doesn't seem to be listed on the sponsor instructions anymore: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_sponsor_a_new_contributor#Sponsoring_Someone_for_Fedora_Package_Collection Thus, I've gone ahead and marked your account as sponsored, as you did a nice job with this spec file. You can now proceed with requesting that this package be added to SCM: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Add_Package_to_Source_Code_Management_.28SCM.29_system_and_Set_Owner
Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-kaptan
python-kaptan-0.5.5-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c0a3cd498a
python-kaptan-0.5.5-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c0a3cd498a
python-kaptan-0.5.5-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.