First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 140716 - the block cursor should be used for the caret position
the block cursor should be used for the caret position
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: openoffice.org (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Dan Williams
: i18n
Depends On:
Blocks: 137149 140583
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2004-11-24 08:37 EST by Akira TAGOH
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:10 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-11-30 00:13:25 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

  None (edit)
Description Akira TAGOH 2004-11-24 08:37:17 EST 
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3)
Gecko/20040922

Description of problem:
Right now OOo's cursor handling for the caret position looks bad, on
even fixed im-sdk packages. and using the block cursor is better way
to solve this problem.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.run oowriter with ja_JP.UTF-8 locale.
2.press ctrl+space s u s h i space n i h o n g o space a backspace
3.
    

Actual Results:  the cursor is located at the beginning of nihongo.

Expected Results:  the block cursor should highlight all of words nihongo.

Additional info:

please compare between gedit and OOo to see what happens. also, the
latest im-sdk (hopefully it will be built soon. otherwise please use
CVS one. let me know if you are unsure) is required, which the caret
position problem was fixed.
Comment 1 Dan Williams 2004-11-29 21:30:13 EST 
This should be fixed with 1.1.2-14.6.EL4, correct?
Comment 2 Akira TAGOH 2004-11-30 00:09:03 EST 
Yes, that's fine. Thanks Dan.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.