Description of problem:
When viewing the rhsm.log after setting up virt-who, it would be helpful to see where the host-to-guest mapping is reporting to. Even if it just took the output from the owner= in the virt-who config file. Which could be either /etc/virt-who.d/config or /etc/sysconfig/virt-who
This is what we see now..
2016-10-26 15:02:26,930 [INFO] @subscriptionmanager.py:165 - Sending update in hosts-to-guests mapping:
If that could show something like this..
2016-10-26 15:02:26,930 [INFO] @subscriptionmanager.py:165 - Sending update in hosts-to-guests mapping to Default_Organization:
then we could see without the config file where the config is pointed to.
The /etc/virt-who.d/config - Does not come in a sosreport currently.
This would also help us if multiple vcenters are involved ( which is very common).
Can help to verify quickly that the owner= is incorrect in the config without having to ask for it.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible: 100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. install and configure virt-who
2. view the rhsm.log for information/troubleshooting why hosts are not showing up in the portal/satellite6 depending on environment
Actual results: does not give us enough information to see where the hosts should be showing up ie portal or satellite
Sending update in hosts-to-guests mapping
Expected results: Sending update in hosts-to-guests mapping to Default_Organization <---
Just as FYI:
/etc/virt-who.d/config is included in recent sosreport for RHEL7  and concerned errata 
(In reply to Kenny Tordeurs from comment #4)
> Just as FYI:
> /etc/virt-who.d/config is included in recent sosreport for RHEL7  and
> concerned errata 
>  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353552
>  https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-2380.html
Kenny thanks for the heads up =D
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.
For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.
If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.