The rpm builds are already tested by our smoke tests. We should probably not be re-testing them from the regression framework
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/16287 (tests: Remove rpm test) posted (#2) for review on master by Nigel Babu (nigelb)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/16287 (tests: Remove rpm test) posted (#3) for review on master by Nigel Babu (nigelb)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/16287 (tests: Remove rpm test) posted (#4) for review on master by Nigel Babu (nigelb)
COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/16287 committed in master by Jeff Darcy (jdarcy) ------ commit 9061ccf0a906925f54f853f92ad609d8269232a2 Author: Nigel Babu <nigelb> Date: Tue Dec 27 10:56:57 2016 +0530 tests: Remove rpm test This is already tested by our smoke test. Testing it again is redundant. Change-Id: Icae4e8650002cd847dcb7ea76fd0447df7e72816 BUG: 1408755 Signed-off-by: Nigel Babu <nigelb> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/16287 NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org> CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> Reviewed-by: Anoop C S <anoopcs> Reviewed-by: Raghavendra Talur <rtalur> Reviewed-by: Jeff Darcy <jdarcy>
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.10.0, please open a new bug report. glusterfs-3.10.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution. [1] http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2017-February/030119.html [2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/