Bug 1409288 - Review Request: rubygem-clutter-gdk - Ruby binding of GDK specific API of Clutter
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-clutter-gdk - Ruby binding of GDK specific API of Clu...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: František Dvořák
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-12-31 08:11 UTC by Mamoru TASAKA
Modified: 2017-02-14 07:11 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-02-14 07:11:09 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
valtri: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Mamoru TASAKA 2016-12-31 08:11:02 UTC
Spec URL: https://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/ruby-gnome2-suite/rubygem-clutter-gdk.spec
SRPM URL: https://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/ruby-gnome2-suite/rubygem-clutter-gdk-3.1.0-1.fc.src.rpm
Description: 
Ruby/ClutterGDK is a Ruby binding of GDK specific API of Clutter.
Fedora Account System Username: mtasaka

Koji scratch build for rawhide:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17124568

Comment 1 František Dvořák 2017-01-18 16:52:11 UTC
In the list has been mentioned the cosmetic thing about ".freeze" - it is possible to use it always - without F26 test. But disabling it when not needed is fine too.

Nice package. APPROVED!


Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated


===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "LGPL (v2.1 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 3 files have
     unknown license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gems,
     /usr/share/gems/doc
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
     that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Ruby:
[x]: Platform dependent files must all go under %{gem_extdir_mri}, platform
     independent under %{gem_dir}.
[x]: Gem package must not define a non-gem subpackage
[x]: Macro %{gem_extdir} is deprecated.
[x]: Gem package is named rubygem-%{gem_name}
[x]: Package contains BuildRequires: rubygems-devel.
[x]: Gem package must define %{gem_name} macro.
[x]: Pure Ruby package must be built as noarch
[x]: Package does not contain Requires: ruby(abi).

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages.
     Note: Package contains font files
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Package functions as described.

     Tested command:
       ruby -rclutter-gdk -e 's=Clutter::Stage.new; s.show; p s.gdk_window'
     Prints:
       #<#<Class:0x00559d757081c8>:0x559d75708100 ptr=0x559d74f5b4b0>

[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

Ruby:
[x]: Specfile should use macros from rubygem-devel package.
[x]: Gem package should exclude cached Gem.
[x]: Gem should use %gem_install macro.
[x]: gems should not require rubygems package
[x]: Test suite should not be run by rake.
[x]: Test suite of the library should be run.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: rubygem-clutter-gdk-3.1.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm
          rubygem-clutter-gdk-doc-3.1.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm
          rubygem-clutter-gdk-3.1.0-1.fc26.src.rpm
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.



Requires
--------
rubygem-clutter-gdk (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    clutter-gtk
    ruby(rubygems)
    rubygem(clutter)
    rubygem(gdk3)

rubygem-clutter-gdk-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    rubygem-clutter-gdk



Provides
--------
rubygem-clutter-gdk:
    rubygem(clutter-gdk)
    rubygem-clutter-gdk

rubygem-clutter-gdk-doc:
    rubygem-clutter-gdk-doc



Source checksums
----------------
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ruby-gnome2/ruby-gnome2/master/clutter-gdk/README.md :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 7c18cd2116f2c233b1d22023b07dd2e8e890b73a71483e67bde7e55636ba4d64
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 7c18cd2116f2c233b1d22023b07dd2e8e890b73a71483e67bde7e55636ba4d64
https://rubygems.org/gems/clutter-gdk-3.1.0.gem :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 2b4b7d632846c5d3906b2c630da589e9a13e9b1e6762511ba18cfd26deaf6a39
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 2b4b7d632846c5d3906b2c630da589e9a13e9b1e6762511ba18cfd26deaf6a39
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ruby-gnome2/ruby-gnome2/master/clutter-gdk/COPYING.LIB :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : dc626520dcd53a22f727af3ee42c770e56c97a64fe3adb063799d8ab032fe551
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : dc626520dcd53a22f727af3ee42c770e56c97a64fe3adb063799d8ab032fe551


Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1409288
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Ruby, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP
Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6

Comment 2 Mamoru TASAKA 2017-01-22 14:48:55 UTC
Thank you for review!

Comment 3 Gwyn Ciesla 2017-01-23 14:17:10 UTC
Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/rubygem-clutter-gdk

Comment 4 Mamoru TASAKA 2017-02-14 07:11:09 UTC
This is already in repository, closing.

Thank you for review!


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.