Bug 1409315 - fedora-review complains about missing gsettings schema scriptlets when they aren't supposed to be used anymore
Summary: fedora-review complains about missing gsettings schema scriptlets when they a...
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: fedora-review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Neal Gompa
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-12-31 14:31 UTC by Neal Gompa
Modified: 2020-12-18 02:53 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: Bug
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Neal Gompa 2016-12-31 14:31:28 UTC 
Description of problem:
Since Fedora 23 is now EOL, fedora-review should no longer be complaining about missing gsettings-schema scriptlets. Fedora 24 and up do not require them, and the guidelines page about them says not to use them: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#GSettings_Schema

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
0.6.1-2.fc25

How reproducible:
Always
Comment 1 Audrey Yeena Toskin 2017-02-25 01:06:03 UTC 
I can confirm this issue. I'm getting same warnings from fedora-review (same version, also Fedora 25) when inspecting some GNOME Shell extensions I'm working on packaging.
Comment 2 Audrey Yeena Toskin 2017-08-06 23:01:13 UTC 
Still an issue in fedora-review version 0.6.1 f03e4e7 2016-05-02 14:21:43 +0200, running on Fedora 26 Workstation x86_64.
Comment 3 Jan Kurik 2017-08-15 07:08:39 UTC 
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 27 development cycle.
Changing version to '27'.
Comment 4 Neal Gompa 2017-09-13 09:51:22 UTC 
Marking as Rawhide, Triaged, and FutureFeature so it doesn't get accidentally closed.
Comment 5 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2020-12-18 02:53:39 UTC 
This package has changed maintainer in the Fedora.
Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.