Description: Arc is a flat theme with transparent elements for GTK 3, GTK 2 and Gnome-Shell which supports GTK 3 and GTK 2 based desktop environments like Gnome, Cinnamon, Budgie, Pantheon, XFCE, Mate, etc. Koji Build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17223697 Issues: No issues spotted. FAS-User: besser82 Urls: Spec URL: https://besser82.fedorapeople.org/review/arc-theme.spec SRPM URL: https://besser82.fedorapeople.org/review/arc-theme-20161119-0.1.fc26.src.rpm Thanks for review in advance!
Taken
Not approved, please fix the directory ownership for folder owned by plank. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated". 62 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/review/1411438-arc- theme/licensecheck.txt [!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/plank/themes(plank), /usr/share/plank(plank) ==> arc-theme provides a theme for plank, but the package should only own the folder containing the arc theme, not the whole /usr/share/plank [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [-]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. ==> is noarch [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Package should not use obsolete m4 macros [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: arc-theme-20161119-0.1.fc26.noarch.rpm arc-theme-20161119-0.1.fc26.src.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Requires -------- arc-theme (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): filesystem gnome-themes-standard gtk-murrine-engine Provides -------- arc-theme: arc-theme Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/horst3180/arc-theme/archive/20161119.tar.gz#/arc-theme-20161119.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : a470ab33b1ad2b4ba280e61f0e1c4f8d4973ceccc84dc2db1e37fae66b5770cd CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : a470ab33b1ad2b4ba280e61f0e1c4f8d4973ceccc84dc2db1e37fae66b5770cd Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -v -L rpm_deps/ -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1411438 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6
(In reply to Christian Dersch from comment #2) > Not approved, please fix the directory ownership for folder owned by plank. > > ---8<--- > > [!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. > Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: > /usr/share/plank/themes(plank), /usr/share/plank(plank) > ==> arc-theme provides a theme for plank, but the package should only own the > folder containing the arc theme, not the whole /usr/share/plank > > ---8<--- Well, I don't think it's really neccessary to pull in a whole application just to fullfill the dir-ownership; the theme enhances Plank, but Plank is not needed to make the theme useable for the broader audience.
replace %{_datadir}/plank by %{_datadir}/plank/themes/Arc to avoid owning of planks directory.
# Updated spec. %changelog * Mon Jan 09 2017 Björn Esser <bjoern.esser> - 20161119-0.2 - Add plank-subpkg and require Plank (rhbz#1411438) * Mon Jan 09 2017 Björn Esser <bjoern.esser> - 20161119-0.1 - Initial package (rhbz#1411438) Koji Build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17225121 Urls: Spec URL: https://besser82.fedorapeople.org/review/arc-theme.spec SRPM URL: https://besser82.fedorapeople.org/review/arc-theme-20161119-0.2.fc26.src.rpm
Looks great now, approved!
Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/arc-theme
arc-theme-20161119-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-0b2abab9a3
arc-theme-20161119-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-26eb572a83
arc-theme-20161119-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-0b2abab9a3
arc-theme-20161119-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-26eb572a83
arc-theme-20161119-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
arc-theme-20161119-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.