Customer is requesting the following: Why do you merge info about OpenShift routes: https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.3/install_config/configuring_routing.html#overview https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.3/install_config/configuring_routing.html#install-config-configuring-route-timeouts With networking IPv4 routing https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.3/install_config/configuring_routing.html#install-config-configuring-native-container-routing in the same document? Would it not make more sense to document one of both topics in a different document?
Work in progress: https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/3624
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/commit/9d27d49fe0a856c6c932a564d78358a9f68a72e0 Bug 1412703, split routing and networking IPv4 routing docs https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/commit/7805d985c07b5d79927be2ddf546ba58958e2be7 Merge pull request #3624 from ahardin-rh/split-routing-networking Bug 1412703, split routing and networking IPv4 routing docs
Content is now published: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/openshift_container_platform/3.5/html/installation_and_configuration/install-config-configuring-native-container-routing https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/openshift_container_platform/3.5/html/installation_and_configuration/install-config-configuring-routing