Description of problem: If this is going to be fixed by BZ #1374545 or not, I am pretty sure this is not desirable behavior I needed to report it. 1. Host is in Maintenance Mode or shutdown, disconnected from iSCSI storage. 2. Activate Host 3. Host connects to Storage 4. All LVs from that Storage are activated (similar to BZ #1374545) 5. VDSM doesn't deactivate them, they are all left active. - Wouldn't it be sane to deactivate them as we do for FC on boot? https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/21291/ For long version, check logs.txt attached. Here is the summary: Jan 13 14:12:28 RHEL-H kernel: scsi 2:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg1 type 0 Jan 13 14:12:28 RHEL-H kernel: sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] 209715200 512-byte logical blocks: (107 GB/100 GiB) Jan 13 14:12:28 RHEL-H kernel: sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk Jan 13 14:12:28 RHEL-H multipathd: sda: add path (uevent) Jan 13 14:12:28 RHEL-H kernel: device-mapper: multipath service-time: version 0.3.0 loaded Jan 13 14:12:28 RHEL-H multipathd: 3600140511e512ba924f4b35a18d95e15: load table [0 209715200 multipath 0 0 1 1 service-time 0 1 1 8:0 1] Jan 13 14:12:28 RHEL-H multipathd: 3600140511e512ba924f4b35a18d95e15: event checker started Jan 13 14:12:28 RHEL-H multipathd: sda [8:0]: path added to devmap 3600140511e512ba924f4b35a18d95e15 Jan 13 14:12:28 RHEL-H systemd: Created slice system-lvm2\x2dpvscan.slice. Jan 13 14:12:28 RHEL-H systemd: Starting system-lvm2\x2dpvscan.slice. Jan 13 14:12:28 RHEL-H systemd: Starting LVM2 PV scan on device 252:0... Jan 13 14:12:29 RHEL-H lvm: 7 logical volume(s) in volume group "f3d842ef-66c3-45f8-86c2-dfd055e10c9b" now active Jan 13 14:12:29 RHEL-H systemd: Started LVM2 PV scan on device 252:0. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): vdsm-4.18.21-1.el7ev.x86_64 kernel-3.10.0-514.2.2.el7.x86_64 lvm2-2.02.166-1.el7_3.1.x86_64 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. Add iSCSI storage 2. Reboot Host 3. Activate Host (so it logs into iSCSI storage) Actual results: All LVs active Expected results: No LVs active
Sounds like https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/56876/ ?
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1374545 ***
(In reply to Yaniv Kaul from comment #2) > Sounds like https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/56876/ ? Yup! Missed it. Sorry. But from that gerrit this is a dup of 1331978 and not 1374545. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1331978 ***