RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1413484 - Unable to connect windows server 2012 servers to samba-3.6.23-36 with out disabling SMB signing
Summary: Unable to connect windows server 2012 servers to samba-3.6.23-36 with out dis...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: samba
Version: 6.8
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Andreas Schneider
QA Contact: qe-baseos-daemons
Lucie Vařáková
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1495448 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 1461138 1504542
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-01-16 06:09 UTC by fjayalat
Modified: 2022-09-16 06:34 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version: samba-3.6.23-47.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Connecting with SMB signing now enabled Previously, the badlock security flaw fixes caused a regression. This prevented users from connecting from Windows server 2012 servers to the Samba suite without disabling the server message block (SMB) signing. With this update, it is possible to connect with SMB signing enabled and the users of Windows server 2012 can connect to samba without problems.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-06-19 05:08:55 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Error (41.82 KB, image/jpeg)
2017-01-16 06:10 UTC, fjayalat 		no flags Details
View All


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2018:1860 0 None None None 2018-06-19 05:10:08 UTC

Description fjayalat 2017-01-16 06:09:24 UTC 
Description of problem:

Unable to connect windows server 2012 servers to samba with out disabling SMB signing. 

Registry :

HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanManServer\Parameters\RequireSecuritySignature 

Samba is not authenticating against AD.

The user coming from Windows to samba is NOT configured and user nobody as guest should be the used at the end to write or read on the filesystem
With "RequireSecuritySignature=0" the anon access is working like expected.

As soon, as I set "RequireSecuritySignature=1" it is not working any more.



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Rhel 6.8 
windows server 2012
samba-3.6.23-36

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:



Expected results:


Additional info:


Customers current configuration :




grep -v ^# etc/samba/smb.conf 
[global]
	workgroup = MYGROUP
        server string = Samba Server Version %v
        map to guest = bad User
        guest account = nobody
	netbios name = rchsat01
        log level = 9
        max log size = 0
	log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
        security = user
        passdb backend = tdbsam
        #server signing = auto
        load printers = yes
        cups options = raw
[homes]
        comment = Home Directories
        browseable = no
        writable = yes
[printers]
        comment = All Printers
        path = /var/spool/samba
        browseable = no
        guest ok = no
        writable = no
        printable = yes
		
[Builds_sat01]

        path = /Builds
        browseable = yes
        guest ok = yes
        writable = yes
        public = yes
        create mask = 0777
        force create mode = 0777
        directory mask = 0777


However this is still failing with the error attached.

I tried to reproduce the issue in-house but I could not. It continued to work with and without security signing on windows server 2012.

I will upload the debug logs and the screensshots we received from the customer.
Comment 1 fjayalat 2017-01-16 06:10:07 UTC 
Created attachment 1241114 [details]
Error
Comment 11 Andreas Schneider 2017-11-15 12:55:14 UTC 
*** Bug 1495448 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 Andreas Schneider 2017-11-15 13:16:14 UTC 
= Reproducer =

== smb.conf ==

[global]
  map to guest = Bad user

[testshare]
  path = /foo
  guest ok = yes

== smbclient ==


smbclient //SERVER/testshare -U% --signing=required
Comment 17 Andreas Schneider 2017-12-14 12:58:30 UTC 
Looking at the log from comment #16, smbd failed to start or update correctly. Or smbd was alredy running and the customer tried to start another instance.
Comment 18 amitkuma 2017-12-25 11:36:08 UTC 
Hello ASN,

Got update from customer after running test-packs:

Freshly installed rhel6.4
[rhel-6.4-Have-test-pack-installed]        Windows-7-Client
                                     RequireSecuritySignature = 0
           <--------Access share------------ Can access[ok]

                                     RequireSecuritySignature = 1
           <--------Access share------------ Cannot access[FAIL]
                          The account is not authorized to log in from this station

Thanks
Amit
Comment 19 amitkuma 2017-12-26 11:04:22 UTC 
Hello ASN,

More testing on Client setup =>

[rhel-6.4-Have-test-pack-installed]        Windows-2012-Client
                                     RequireSecuritySignature = 0
           <--------Access share------------ Can access[ok]

                                     RequireSecuritySignature = 1
           <--------Access share------------ Can access[ok]


[rhel-6.4-Have-test-pack-installed]        smbclient
                                   # smbclient //<ip>/share -U% --signing=required
                                   smb> 
                                         Can access[ok]
                                   # smbclient //<ip>/share -U% --signing=auto
                                   smb> 
                                         Can access[ok]

Same behavior on samba4.

Thanks
Amit
Comment 20 amitkuma 2017-12-26 11:52:49 UTC 
Please Ignore Comment#19:
This is correct one:

[rhel-6.4-Have-test-pack-installed]        Windows-2012-Client
                                     RequireSecuritySignature = 0
           <--------Access share------------ Can access[ok]

                                     RequireSecuritySignature = 1
                                      ....Cannot Not test....


[rhel-6.4-Have-test-pack-installed]        smbclient
                                   # smbclient //<ip>/share -U% --signing=required
                                   smb> 
                                         Can access[ok]
                                   # smbclient //<ip>/share -U% --signing=auto
                                   smb> 
                                         Can access[ok]

[rhel-6.4-Have-test-pack-installed]        Windows-7-Client
                                     RequireSecuritySignature = 0
           <--------Access share------------ Can access[ok]

                                     RequireSecuritySignature = 1
           <--------Access share------------ Cannot access[FAIL]
                          The account is not authorized to log in from this station

Thanks
Amit
Comment 29 errata-xmlrpc 2018-06-19 05:08:55 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1860
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.