Description of problem: # dnf --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=fedora list availablroot@ceramic:~/usr/cnf[2]# dnf --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=fedora list available --showduplicates systemd* | grep -v @ Last metadata expiration check: 0:09:43 ago on Tue Jan 17 13:52:10 2017. Available Packages systemd.i686 231-10.fc25 fedora systemd.x86_64 231-10.fc25 fedora systemd-bootchart.x86_64 231-2.fc25 fedora systemd-container.i686 231-10.fc25 fedora systemd-container.x86_64 231-10.fc25 fedora systemd-devel.i686 231-10.fc25 fedora systemd-devel.x86_64 231-10.fc25 fedora systemd-journal-remote.x86_64 231-10.fc25 fedora systemd-libs.i686 231-10.fc25 fedora systemd-libs.x86_64 231-10.fc25 fedora systemd-pam.i686 231-10.fc25 fedora systemd-pam.x86_64 231-10.fc25 fedora systemd-udev.x86_64 231-10.fc25 fedora Note that systemd, systemd-pam, systemd-libs, systemd-devel and systemd-container are multilibbed (both i686 and x86_64 packages). # dnf --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=updates list available --showduplicates systemd* | grep -v @ Last metadata expiration check: 0:11:07 ago on Tue Jan 17 13:52:04 2017. Available Packages systemd.i686 231-12.fc25 updates systemd.x86_64 231-12.fc25 updates systemd-container.i686 231-12.fc25 updates systemd-container.x86_64 231-12.fc25 updates systemd-devel.i686 231-12.fc25 updates systemd-devel.x86_64 231-12.fc25 updates systemd-journal-remote.x86_64 231-12.fc25 updates systemd-libs.i686 231-12.fc25 updates systemd-libs.x86_64 231-12.fc25 updates systemd-pam.x86_64 231-12.fc25 updates systemd-udev.x86_64 231-12.fc25 updates systemd-pam is available only on x86_64, which is a problem for people running i386 pam programs. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 231-12.fc25 How reproducible: Always
I think this must be some glitch in the infrastructure. systemd-231-12.fc25 was built with systemd-pam.i686 as usual: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=834111. Seems to work here, I get systemd-libs.i686, systemd-lib.x86_64, but 232-11.fc25. Maybe the mirrors are syncing?
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1) > I think this must be some glitch in the infrastructure. systemd-231-12.fc25 > was built with systemd-pam.i686 as usual: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=834111. > > Seems to work here, I get systemd-libs.i686, systemd-lib.x86_64, but > 232-11.fc25. Maybe the mirrors are syncing? Mmm, it was the same problem with 231-11, I doubt the mirrors were syncing since 231-11 was released. I don't know if that's a primary, but http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/25/x86_64/s/ only shows: [ ] systemd-pam-231-12.fc25.x86_64.rpm 2017-01-16 13:24 177K
https://mirror.chpc.utah.edu/pub/fedora/linux/updates/25/x86_64/s/ has both. (I went to http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/25/x86_64/s/ and got randomly redirected from there.) Try dnf clean all...
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #3) > https://mirror.chpc.utah.edu/pub/fedora/linux/updates/25/x86_64/s/ has both. > > (I went to > http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/25/x86_64/s/ and > got randomly redirected from there.) Noy as seen from here: https://mirror.chpc.utah.edu/pub/fedora/linux/updates/25/x86_64/s/ [ ] systemd-journal-remote-231-12.fc25.x86_64.rpm 2017-01-16 06:24 136K [ ] systemd-libs-231-12.fc25.i686.rpm 2017-01-16 06:24 443K [ ] systemd-libs-231-12.fc25.x86_64.rpm 2017-01-16 06:24 421K [ ] systemd-pam-231-12.fc25.x86_64.rpm 2017-01-16 06:24 177K [ ] systemd-udev-231-12.fc25.x86_64.rpm 2017-01-16 06:24 1.3M Two systemd-libs, but one systemd-pam. Same on: http://mirror.math.princeton.edu/pub/fedora/linux/updates/25/x86_64/s/ > Try dnf clean all... It doesn't help.
14:11 < zbyszek> dgilmore: OK. So what do I need to do to get it multilibbed? 14:27 < dgilmore> zbyszek: there is not really a good way 14:27 < dgilmore> zbyszek: one way would be to make systemd-devel require it 14:28 < dgilmore> zbyszek: multilib is a ugly hack that really does not work well http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/systemd.git/commit/?h=f25&id=5d20f321b07af63812826fdf48ece50e4e1fd7f5 As a work-around, please install systemd-pam.i686 directly from koji.
Yes, that's what I've done. I don't know much about the Fedora infrastructure, but it looks to me that this is handled by the RPM repository and not in the package spec itself.
This message is a reminder that Fedora 25 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 25. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '25'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 25 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
Fedora 25 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2017-12-12. Fedora 25 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.