RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1416496 - getaddrinfo() call returns wrong IPv6 address if nscd is used
Summary: getaddrinfo() call returns wrong IPv6 address if nscd is used
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: glibc
Version: 6.9
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Florian Weimer
QA Contact: Sergey Kolosov
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-01-25 15:54 UTC by Sergey Kolosov
Modified: 2017-03-21 10:38 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version: glibc-2.12-1.209.el6
Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
undefined
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-03-21 10:38:24 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
getaddrinfo.c test program originally from bug 970090 (1.76 KB, text/plain)
2017-01-25 15:54 UTC, Sergey Kolosov
no flags Details


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 1223095 0 medium CLOSED access to uninitialized memory in getaddrinfo if nscd is running 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2017:0680 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Moderate: glibc security and bug fix update 2017-03-21 12:36:34 UTC

Internal Links: 1223095

Description Sergey Kolosov 2017-01-25 15:54:57 UTC
Created attachment 1244293 [details]
getaddrinfo.c test program originally from bug 970090

Description of problem:
getaddrinfo() call returns wrong IPv6 address if nscd is used

Version-Release number of selected component:
glibc-2.12-1.208.el6

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install nscd and run it
2. ./getaddrinfo AF_INET6 localhost
[0 root@host ~]# ./getaddrinfo AF_INET6 localhost 
Hints family=10
host=7f00:1::, family=10 addr=7f00:1::
host=7f00:1::, family=10 addr=7f00:1::
host=7f00:1::, family=10 addr=7f00:1::
[0 root@host ~]#

Actual results:

host=7f00:1::, family=10 addr=7f00:1::
host=7f00:1::, family=10 addr=7f00:1::
host=7f00:1::, family=10 addr=7f00:1::

Expected results:

host=localhost, family=10 addr=::1
host=localhost, family=10 addr=::1
host=localhost, family=10 addr=::1

Comment 1 Florian Weimer 2017-01-25 16:04:28 UTC
Sergey, do you know if this is a regression in glibc-2.12-1.208.el6?  Thanks.

Comment 2 Sergey Kolosov 2017-01-25 16:57:19 UTC
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #1)
> Sergey, do you know if this is a regression in glibc-2.12-1.208.el6?  Thanks.

It is glibc-2.12-1.208.el6 regression and it is related to patch for bug 1223095.
Upstream fix: https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=8dc9751764eb1bedf06d19695524b31a16773413

I have tested the upstream fix on x86_64 host, it works.

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2017-03-21 10:38:24 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0680.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.