Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 1416856 - (CVE-2017-3732) CVE-2017-3732 openssl: BN_mod_exp may produce incorrect results on x86_64
CVE-2017-3732 openssl: BN_mod_exp may produce incorrect results on x86_64
Status: NEW
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability (Show other bugs)
unspecified
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Red Hat Product Security
impact=moderate,public=20170126,repor...
: Security
Depends On: 1416867 1420895 1420896 1416864 1416865 1618719 1618720 1618721 1624844 1624845
Blocks: 1416858
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2017-01-26 10:44 EST by Andrej Nemec
Modified: 2018-10-19 17:39 EDT (History)
55 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: openssl 1.0.2k, openssl 1.1.0d
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2018:2185 None None None 2018-07-12 12:17 EDT
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2018:2186 None None None 2018-07-12 12:15 EDT
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2018:2187 None None None 2018-07-12 12:05 EDT
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2018:2568 None None None 2018-08-27 10:20 EDT
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2018:2575 None None None 2018-08-28 15:19 EDT
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2018:2713 None None None 2018-09-17 10:53 EDT

  None (edit)
Description Andrej Nemec 2017-01-26 10:44:15 EST
There is a carry propagating bug in the x86_64 Montgomery squaring procedure. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just feasible (although very difficult) because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be very significant and likely only accessible to a limited number of attackers. An attacker would additionally need online access to an unpatched system using the target private key in a scenario with persistent DH parameters and a private key that is shared between multiple clients. For example this can occur by default in OpenSSL DHE based SSL/TLS ciphersuites.

Note: This issue is very similar to CVE-2015-3193 but must be treated as a separate problem.

OpenSSL 1.0.2 users should upgrade to 1.0.2k

External References:

https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20170126.txt
Comment 1 Andrej Nemec 2017-01-26 11:08:46 EST
Created openssl101e tracking bugs for this issue:

Affects: epel-5 [bug 1416866]
Comment 2 Andrej Nemec 2017-01-26 11:09:13 EST
Created openssl tracking bugs for this issue:

Affects: fedora-all [bug 1416864]
Comment 3 Andrej Nemec 2017-01-26 11:09:32 EST
Created mingw-openssl tracking bugs for this issue:

Affects: fedora-all [bug 1416865]
Affects: epel-7 [bug 1416867]
Comment 5 Tomas Hoger 2017-01-26 16:24:44 EST
Affected code does not exist in OpenSSL 1.0.1 and earlier.  It's the same code that was affected by the CVE-2015-3193 (bug 1288317).
Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2018-07-12 12:05:23 EDT
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat JBoss Core Services

Via RHSA-2018:2187 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2187
Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2018-07-12 12:15:04 EDT
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  JBoss Core Services on RHEL 6

Via RHSA-2018:2186 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2186
Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2018-07-12 12:17:26 EDT
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  JBoss Core Services on RHEL 7

Via RHSA-2018:2185 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2185
Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2018-08-27 10:20:14 EDT
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Supplementary

Via RHSA-2018:2568 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2568
Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2018-08-28 15:18:44 EDT
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Supplementary

Via RHSA-2018:2575 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2575
Comment 15 errata-xmlrpc 2018-09-17 10:53:34 EDT
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Satellite 5.8

Via RHSA-2018:2713 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2713

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.