Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Customer is working with RH CEE on a failed upgrade from 6.1 to 6.2 and is seeking a method to determine which managed hosts are lacking the Katello Agent


How reproducible:
Using the UI or ClI attempt to filter a list of hosts that do not have the Katello Agent installed. The list should include package details to confirm the version of the Katello Agent. Additionally a template should be available to correct this as a bulk action


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Created attachment 1380125 [details]
search via the UI

This search can be done via the UI (See attachment) as well as the CLI. 

hammer host list --search "not installed_package_name = katello-agent"

This functionality already exists

Closing per comment 5.