Description of problem: ======================= I created a router and connect it to external gateway and internal network but on CFME Cloud Router Summary show Cloud subnets = 0 Version-Release number of selected component: ============================================= 5.7.1.0.20170124142149_8a5f4d5 How reproducible: ================= 100% Steps to Reproduce: ==================== Note: I have attached the interface to the router via OpenStack CLI due to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1413212 1. Create a router on overcloud 2. Set a gateway 3. Add an internal network to the router Actual results: =============== CFME Router Summary does show the sunbet which connected to the router Cloud subnets 0 Expected results: ================= Cloud subnets 1 , and linked to the correct internal subnet Additional info: ================ [stack@undercloud-0 ~]$ neutron router-port-list Router123_admin +--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | id | name | mac_address | fixed_ips | +--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | 27a92c25-e8a9-498e-bea2-ad0cea3ea891 | HA port tenant 3fbc9300d381402bb34ae5ceec6bf54b | fa:16:3e:5c:82:26 | {"subnet_id": "023adff3-6778-4d12-987c-3995fb84e128", "ip_address": "169.254.192.1"} | | 5bd59257-98d2-4d4d-a3a0-57aadf9d2030 | | fa:16:3e:61:04:69 | {"subnet_id": "4add835e-6bf7-4bee-8f25-012660e1c094", "ip_address": "10.0.0.213"} | | 7d383b44-cea0-4432-89bd-2f5bb772d1e1 | HA port tenant 3fbc9300d381402bb34ae5ceec6bf54b | fa:16:3e:16:be:9d | {"subnet_id": "023adff3-6778-4d12-987c-3995fb84e128", "ip_address": "169.254.192.2"} | | e95f0696-1f85-4ffe-96c7-d00b8d7963b8 | HA port tenant 3fbc9300d381402bb34ae5ceec6bf54b | fa:16:3e:36:e0:53 | {"subnet_id": "023adff3-6778-4d12-987c-3995fb84e128", "ip_address": "169.254.192.9"} | | f69684e8-6d09-4b39-baac-541d2bccc637 | | fa:16:3e:da:1c:fe | {"subnet_id": "5da1c822-2986-465c-a0e3-66fba024f911", "ip_address": "192.168.100.1"} | +--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Created attachment 1246603 [details] neutron router-port-list
Reproduced with CFME 5.8.0.7 and RHOS 10
I don't think there's an easily determined direct relationship between a router and a subnet - correct me if I'm wrong? If I'm not, it might be simplest to simply remove the subnet entry in the table, as it's misleading. Thoughts?
Ah, nevermind - I did a little more research, and I think I understand how it's supposed to be done. Thanks!
Fixed by: https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-openstack/pull/31
Please assess the importance of this issue and update the priority accordingly. Somewhere it was missed in the bug triage process. Please refer to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#priority for a reminder on each priority's definition. If it's something like a tracker bug where it doesn't matter, please set it to Low/Low.
I believe this should be fixed in latest releases, moving to ON_QA
Verified ======== 5.8.2.0