Spec URL: https://jchaloup.fedorapeople.org/reviews/golang-github-karlseguin-ccache/golang-github-karlseguin-ccache.spec SRPM URL: https://jchaloup.fedorapeople.org/reviews/golang-github-karlseguin-ccache/golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-0-0.1.gita2d6215.fc24.src.rpm Description: A golang LRU Cache for high concurrency Fedora Account System Username: jchaloup $ rpmlint golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-0-0.1.gita2d6215.fc24.src.rpm golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-devel-0-0.1.gita2d6215.fc24.noarch.rpm golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-unit-test-devel-0-0.1.gita2d6215.fc24.x86_64.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Should we make the version match the latest release: https://github.com/karlseguin/ccache/releases/tag/v2.0.2 Issues: ======= - Package installs properly. Note: Installation errors (see attachment) See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines This fails because these two packages are needed golang(github.com/karlseguin/expect) golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-devel ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 15 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/vagrant/1418371-golang-github-karlseguin-ccache/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gocode/src, /usr/share/gocode, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com These are directories owned by golang rpm - should we require golang be installed? [ ]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/karlseguin(golang-github-karlseguin- expect-devel) Not sure what to do about this [-]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. no build section [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in golang- github-karlseguin-ccache-devel , golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-unit- test-devel [x]: Package functions as described. Tested with the following program: [vagrant@f25vanilla ~]$ export GOPATH=/usr/share/gocode/ [vagrant@f25vanilla ~]$ [vagrant@f25vanilla ~]$ cat file2.go package main import ( "github.com/karlseguin/ccache" "time" "log" ) func main() { var cache = ccache.New(ccache.Configure()) //var cache = ccache.New(ccache.Configure().MaxSize(1000).ItemsToPrune(100)) cache.Set("user:4", "testvalue", time.Minute * 10) item := cache.Get("user:4") if item == nil { log.Fatal("ERROR 1") } else { user := item.Value() log.Print("Got: ", user) } cache.Delete("user:4") item = cache.Get("user:4") if item == nil { log.Print("yay! it's empty") } else { log.Fatal("ERROR 2") } } [vagrant@f25vanilla ~]$ go run file2.go 2017/03/12 21:42:53 Got: testvalue 2017/03/12 21:42:53 yay! it's empty [x]: Latest version is packaged. The commit from this package matches the latest released version: 2.0.2 == a2d6215 https://github.com/karlseguin/ccache/releases/tag/v2.0.2 [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: Mock build failed See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#rpmlint This fails because these two packages are needed golang(github.com/karlseguin/expect) golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-devel [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Installation errors ------------------- INFO: mock.py version 1.3.4 starting (python version = 3.5.2)... Start: init plugins INFO: selinux enabled Finish: init plugins Start: run Start: chroot init INFO: calling preinit hooks INFO: enabled root cache INFO: enabled dnf cache Start: cleaning dnf metadata Finish: cleaning dnf metadata INFO: enabled HW Info plugin Mock Version: 1.3.4 INFO: Mock Version: 1.3.4 Finish: chroot init INFO: installing package(s): /home/vagrant/1418371-golang-github-karlseguin-ccache/results/golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-unit-test-devel-0-0.1.gita2d6215.fc25.x86_64.rpm /home/vagrant/1418371-golang-github-karlseguin-ccache/results/golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-devel-0-0.1.gita2d6215.fc25.noarch.rpm ERROR: Command failed. See logs for output. # /usr/bin/dnf --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-25-x86_64/root/ --releasever 25 --disableplugin=local --setopt=deltarpm=false install /home/vagrant/1418371-golang-github-karlseguin-ccache/results/golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-unit-test-devel-0-0.1.gita2d6215.fc25.x86_64.rpm /home/vagrant/1418371-golang-github-karlseguin-ccache/results/golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-devel-0-0.1.gita2d6215.fc25.noarch.rpm --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts Rpmlint ------- Checking: golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-devel-0-0.1.gita2d6215.fc25.noarch.rpm golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-unit-test-devel-0-0.1.gita2d6215.fc25.x86_64.rpm golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-0-0.1.gita2d6215.fc25.src.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Requires -------- golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-unit-test-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): golang(github.com/karlseguin/expect) golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-devel golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-unit-test-devel: golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-unit-test-devel golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-unit-test-devel(x86-64) golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-devel: golang(github.com/karlseguin/ccache) golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-devel Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/karlseguin/ccache/archive/a2d62155777b39595c825ed3824279e642a5db3c/ccache-a2d6215.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 223869c1c17b03214ef2b84ead0df42c17499d0931a48c41a11b83427d7a02ae CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 223869c1c17b03214ef2b84ead0df42c17499d0931a48c41a11b83427d7a02ae Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1418371 Buildroot used: fedora-25-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6
> Issues: > ======= > - Package installs properly. > Note: Installation errors (see attachment) > See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines > > This fails because these two packages are needed > > golang(github.com/karlseguin/expect) Provided by different that is on review > golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-devel Provided by this package itself > > > > ===== MUST items ===== > > Generic: > [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets > other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging > Guidelines. > [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. > Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses > found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 15 files have > unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in > /home/vagrant/1418371-golang-github-karlseguin-ccache/licensecheck.txt > [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. > [ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates. > Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gocode/src, > /usr/share/gocode, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com > > These are directories owned by golang rpm - should we require golang be installed? Does not make much sense to install devel source code without the compiler so the dependency on golang is intentionally ignored > > [ ]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. > Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: > /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/karlseguin(golang-github-karlseguin- > expect-devel) > > Not sure what to do about this Ignore it. The spec looks fine. If not, that is something that needs to be fix globally. > > ===== SHOULD items ===== > > Generic: > > [x]: Latest version is packaged. > > The commit from this package matches the latest released version: > 2.0.2 == a2d6215 > https://github.com/karlseguin/ccache/releases/tag/v2.0.2 > We don't package latest releases by default (unless requested) since projects need particular commits which do not have to be backward compatible with the latest releases.
(In reply to Jan Chaloupka from comment #2) > > Issues: > > ======= > > - Package installs properly. > > Note: Installation errors (see attachment) > > See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines > > > > This fails because these two packages are needed > > > > golang(github.com/karlseguin/expect) > > Provided by different that is on review Yep. I was just trying to explain why it failed :) > > > golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-devel > > Provided by this package itself +1 > > > > > > > > > ===== MUST items ===== > > > > Generic: > > [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets > > other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging > > Guidelines. > > [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. > > Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses > > found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 15 files have > > unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in > > /home/vagrant/1418371-golang-github-karlseguin-ccache/licensecheck.txt > > [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. > > [ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates. > > Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gocode/src, > > /usr/share/gocode, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com > > > > These are directories owned by golang rpm - should we require golang be installed? > > Does not make much sense to install devel source code without the compiler > so the dependency on golang is intentionally ignored +1 > > > > > [ ]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. > > Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: > > /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/karlseguin(golang-github-karlseguin- > > expect-devel) > > > > Not sure what to do about this > > Ignore it. The spec looks fine. If not, that is something that needs to be > fix globally. hmm, ok, +1 > > > > > ===== SHOULD items ===== > > > > Generic: > > > > [x]: Latest version is packaged. > > > > The commit from this package matches the latest released version: > > 2.0.2 == a2d6215 > > https://github.com/karlseguin/ccache/releases/tag/v2.0.2 > > > > We don't package latest releases by default (unless requested) since > projects need particular commits which do not have to be backward compatible > with the latest releases. interesting. I would have thought we wanted to use release numbers instead of git commits if possible. This commit does match the latest released version. What you are saying is that if etcd all of a sudden now needs some arbitrary commit then it wouldn't be good to have a "version" other than 0 for this rpm? What happens if another package needs this dependency and needs it at a different git commit?
> If you are saying the commit the is currently in the spec is of version 2.0.2, then I will fix the spec file. > What happens if another package needs this dependency and needs it at a different git commit? Disaster, end of the world, no more daylight. Well, if the different commit is backward compatible with the current one, it should be ok to build it. If it is not, some projects need to use bundled dependency.
> interesting. I would have thought we wanted to use release numbers instead of git commits if possible. This commit does match the latest released version. What you are saying is that if etcd all of a sudden now needs some arbitrary commit then it wouldn't be good to have a "version" other than 0 for this rpm? If you are saying the commit the is currently in the spec is of version 2.0.2, then I will fix the spec file.
(In reply to Jan Chaloupka from comment #4) > > If you are saying the commit the is currently in the spec is of version 2.0.2, then I will fix the spec file. yes, 2.0.2 == a2d6215 https://github.com/karlseguin/ccache/releases/tag/v2.0.2
Spec URL: https://jchaloup.fedorapeople.org/reviews/golang-github-karlseguin-ccache/golang-github-karlseguin-ccache.spec SRPM URL: https://jchaloup.fedorapeople.org/reviews/golang-github-karlseguin-ccache/golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-2.0.2-0.1.gita2d6215.fc24.src.rpm
I see you updated to 2.0.2 - LGTM
Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/golang-github-karlseguin-ccache
golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-2.0.2-0.1.gita2d6215.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ed9e4516b2
golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-2.0.2-0.1.gita2d6215.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-f7cd6f8f67
golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-2.0.2-0.1.gita2d6215.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-6c0ada412d
golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-2.0.2-0.1.gita2d6215.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-40f2ec86ac
golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-2.0.2-0.1.gita2d6215.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-a502a1d2a2
golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-2.0.2-0.1.gita2d6215.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-6c0ada412d
golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-2.0.2-0.1.gita2d6215.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-a502a1d2a2
golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-2.0.2-0.1.gita2d6215.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ed9e4516b2
golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-2.0.2-0.1.gita2d6215.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-f7cd6f8f67
golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-2.0.2-0.1.gita2d6215.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-40f2ec86ac
should be able to push to stable now
golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-2.0.2-0.1.gita2d6215.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-2.0.2-0.1.gita2d6215.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-2.0.2-0.1.gita2d6215.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
golang-github-karlseguin-ccache-2.0.2-0.1.gita2d6215.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.