Bug 1418417 - packaging: remove glusterfs-ganesha subpackage
Summary: packaging: remove glusterfs-ganesha subpackage
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: GlusterFS
Classification: Community
Component: packaging
Version: mainline
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Kaleb KEITHLEY
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1418419
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-02-01 19:20 UTC by Kaleb KEITHLEY
Modified: 2023-09-14 03:53 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: glusterfs-3.11.0
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 1418419 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-05-30 18:40:54 UTC
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Kaleb KEITHLEY 2017-02-01 19:20:31 UTC
Description of problem:

now that storhaug is available in Fedora add dependency

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Worker Ant 2017-02-01 19:22:24 UTC
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/16506 (packaging (storhaug): add storhaug dependency for glusterfs-ganesha) posted (#2) for review on master by Kaleb KEITHLEY (kkeithle)

Comment 2 Jose A. Rivera 2017-02-02 07:29:19 UTC
Is this really needed? Aren't you able to run NFS-Ganesha on its own without either GlusterFS or HA? In anything the dependency should be the other way around, and storhaug-nfs should depend on NFS-Ganesha.

--Jose

Comment 3 Soumya Koduri 2017-02-03 06:47:48 UTC
(In reply to Jose A. Rivera from comment #2)
> Is this really needed? Aren't you able to run NFS-Ganesha on its own without
> either GlusterFS or HA? In anything the dependency should be the other way
> around, and storhaug-nfs should depend on NFS-Ganesha.
> 
> --Jose

Agree. That was my understanding too. Shouldn't we be doing all nfs-ganesha HA related configuration using storehaug and deprecate Gluster CLIs?

Comment 4 Kaleb KEITHLEY 2017-02-04 12:11:30 UTC
Yeah, even before I saw the latest comments I was thinking instead to
1) completely delete glusterfs-ganesha sub-package
2) delete all ganesha CLIs from gluster/glusterd.

Revised patches coming soon.

Comment 5 Worker Ant 2017-02-06 12:05:11 UTC
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/16506 (packaging (ganesha): remove glusterfs-ganesha sub-package and related files) posted (#3) for review on master by Kaleb KEITHLEY (kkeithle)

Comment 6 Worker Ant 2017-02-12 15:14:47 UTC
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/16506 (packaging: (ganesha) remove glusterfs-ganesha subpackage and related files)) posted (#5) for review on master by Kaleb KEITHLEY (kkeithle)

Comment 7 Worker Ant 2017-02-20 12:46:54 UTC
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/16506 (packaging: (ganesha) remove glusterfs-ganesha subpackage and related files)) posted (#6) for review on master by Kaleb KEITHLEY (kkeithle)

Comment 8 Worker Ant 2017-02-23 13:13:04 UTC
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/16506 (packaging: (ganesha) remove glusterfs-ganesha subpackage and related files)) posted (#7) for review on master by Kaleb KEITHLEY (kkeithle)

Comment 9 Worker Ant 2017-03-21 17:14:34 UTC
COMMIT: https://review.gluster.org/16506 committed in master by Kaleb KEITHLEY (kkeithle) 
------
commit 0cf2963f12a8b540a7042605d8c79f638fdf6cee
Author: Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeithle>
Date:   Wed Feb 1 07:50:17 2017 -0500

    packaging: (ganesha) remove glusterfs-ganesha subpackage and related files)
    
    Indiana Jones and the Temple of Ganesha HA, part two.
    
    remove glsuterfs-ganesha subpackage, superceded by storhaug
    
    Change-Id: I42a1fc59159add108d77080b9b130696216aa76d
    BUG: 1418417
    Signed-off-by: Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeithle>
    Reviewed-on: https://review.gluster.org/16506
    Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org>
    NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org>
    CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org>
    Reviewed-by: jiffin tony Thottan <jthottan>

Comment 10 Shyamsundar 2017-05-30 18:40:54 UTC
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.11.0, please open a new bug report.

glusterfs-3.11.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution.

[1] http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/announce/2017-May/000073.html
[2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/

Comment 11 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-14 03:53:01 UTC
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.