Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Description of problem:

Create incremental iso updates for Satellite 6. Currently there no incremental ISO updates for Satellite 6. Would like to see these made available as in Satellite 5

Hi Josh, are you looking for an incremental iso based upon something like a content view?

(In reply to Brad Buckingham from comment #1)
> Hi Josh, are you looking for an incremental iso based upon something like a
> content view?

Hi Brad,

The customer is used to seeing monthly incremental iso drops for Sat 5. Instead of a massive 3 month update to the base channel ISO's we would drop a monthly iso which had all the newest packages from the past month in the channels.

In Sat 6 we've been dropping updated repositories about every 3 months on the dot. I'm not sure how incremental isos would translate over to Sat 6/cdn or if they translate over at all. I know that the cdn is structured differently than the RHN but that is the extent of my knowledge. 

Let me know if I can clarify further.

~Josh

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1312113 ***