RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1423012 - Firefox 52 Segfaults When you Right-Click on PPC64
Summary: Firefox 52 Segfaults When you Right-Click on PPC64
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: firefox
Version: 7.3
Hardware: ppc64
OS: Linux
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Martin Stransky
QA Contact: Desktop QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1423011 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-02-16 20:59 UTC by Michael Boisvert
Modified: 2018-02-02 09:06 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version: firefox-52.0-3.el7
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-05-26 13:58:29 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
backtrace (356.96 KB, text/plain)
2017-02-22 13:10 UTC, Tomas Pelka
no flags Details
ff segfault on start bt (96.63 KB, text/plain)
2017-03-06 20:15 UTC, Tomas Pelka
no flags Details
patch (655 bytes, patch)
2018-02-02 09:06 UTC, Martin Stransky
no flags Details | Diff

Description Michael Boisvert 2017-02-16 20:59:50 UTC
Description of problem: ESR52 crashes when you right click on seemingly any web page. 

Version-Release number of selected component: firefox-52.0-0.11.el7_3.ppc64.rpm

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open a webpage in FF52.
2. Right click on a "blank" portion of the page.

Actual results: Firefox crashes.

Expected results: No crash.

Additional info: This came about when testing the context menu that appears from right clicking. You are able to navigate back, forward, refresh and bookmark a page within the right-click context menu. Doesn't appear on ppc64le.

Comment 1 Michael Boisvert 2017-02-16 21:26:38 UTC
Also occurring on s390x.

Comment 3 Tomas Pelka 2017-02-22 13:10:16 UTC
Created attachment 1256457 [details]
backtrace

Comment 5 Martin Stransky 2017-03-02 14:42:42 UTC
*** Bug 1423011 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 Tomas Pelka 2017-03-06 20:15:10 UTC
Created attachment 1260558 [details]
ff segfault on start bt

Unfortunately we've got another SIGSEGV right after start on ppc64. BT attached.

Comment 7 Tomas Pelka 2017-03-06 20:17:51 UTC
firefox-52.0-4.el7_3

Comment 8 Tomas Pelka 2017-03-07 09:17:10 UTC
(In reply to Tomas Pelka from comment #6)
> Created attachment 1260558 [details]
> ff segfault on start bt
> 
> Unfortunately we've got another SIGSEGV right after start on ppc64. BT
> attached.

Moving to separated bz (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1429837) per stransky request.

Comment 11 Tomas Pelka 2017-05-26 13:44:23 UTC
This issue was dropped from erratum, does it mean it is not fixed?

Comment 12 Martin Stransky 2017-05-26 13:58:29 UTC
It's already fixed.

Comment 13 Martin Stransky 2018-02-02 09:06:51 UTC
Created attachment 1390025 [details]
patch


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.