This service will be undergoing maintenance at 00:00 UTC, 2016-08-01. It is expected to last about 1 hours
Bug 142366 - regression between libgcj.so.4 and libgcj.so.5 (OOo and libgcj)
regression between libgcj.so.4 and libgcj.so.5 (OOo and libgcj)
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gcc (Show other bugs)
rawhide
i386 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Tom Tromey
http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/gcj....
:
Depends On:
Blocks: 129762
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2004-12-09 04:46 EST by Caolan McNamara
Modified: 2014-08-11 01:46 EDT (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: 3.4.3-17
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-02-08 08:59:19 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
testcase (1.23 KB, application/x-gzip)
2004-12-09 04:46 EST, Caolan McNamara
no flags Details

  None (edit)
Description Caolan McNamara 2004-12-09 04:46:01 EST
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3)
Gecko/20041204

Description of problem:
As discussed at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2004-12/msg00042.html there
is an apparent regression between libgcj.so.4 and libgcj.so.5.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
libgcj-3.4.3-7

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. run script in attachment    

Actual Results:  4 lines of output of
"A: registerInterface"

Expected Results:  6 lines of output of 
"A: registerInterface"

Additional info:

libgcj4 works, while libgcj5 and libgcj6 are problematic. The attached
example is a minimal example of the OOo java uno component requirements.
Comment 1 Caolan McNamara 2004-12-09 04:46:29 EST
Created attachment 108188 [details]
testcase
Comment 2 Tom Tromey 2005-01-17 16:01:56 EST
The fix for this has been in gcc cvs head for a while.
I just now put it on the 3.4 branch as well.  I CCd Jakub
on the email, asking him to put it in the RH 3.4.
Comment 3 Jakub Jelinek 2005-02-08 08:59:19 EST
This should be fixed in gcc-3.4.3-17 then, by:
* Tue Jan 25 2005 Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com> 3.4.3-17
- update from gcc-3_4-branch
as Tom checked that in on Jan, 17th.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.