Bug 142366 - regression between libgcj.so.4 and libgcj.so.5 (OOo and libgcj)
Summary: regression between libgcj.so.4 and libgcj.so.5 (OOo and libgcj)
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gcc   
(Show other bugs)
Version: rawhide
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tom Tromey
QA Contact:
URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/gcj....
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks: 129762
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2004-12-09 09:46 UTC by Caolan McNamara
Modified: 2014-08-11 05:46 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 3.4.3-17
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-02-08 13:59:19 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
testcase (1.23 KB, application/x-gzip)
2004-12-09 09:46 UTC, Caolan McNamara
no flags Details

Description Caolan McNamara 2004-12-09 09:46:01 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3)
Gecko/20041204

Description of problem:
As discussed at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2004-12/msg00042.html there
is an apparent regression between libgcj.so.4 and libgcj.so.5.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
libgcj-3.4.3-7

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. run script in attachment    

Actual Results:  4 lines of output of
"A: registerInterface"

Expected Results:  6 lines of output of 
"A: registerInterface"

Additional info:

libgcj4 works, while libgcj5 and libgcj6 are problematic. The attached
example is a minimal example of the OOo java uno component requirements.

Comment 1 Caolan McNamara 2004-12-09 09:46:29 UTC
Created attachment 108188 [details]
testcase

Comment 2 Tom Tromey 2005-01-17 21:01:56 UTC
The fix for this has been in gcc cvs head for a while.
I just now put it on the 3.4 branch as well.  I CCd Jakub
on the email, asking him to put it in the RH 3.4.


Comment 3 Jakub Jelinek 2005-02-08 13:59:19 UTC
This should be fixed in gcc-3.4.3-17 then, by:
* Tue Jan 25 2005 Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com> 3.4.3-17
- update from gcc-3_4-branch
as Tom checked that in on Jan, 17th.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.