Bug 142438 - dmraid fails to group certain Promise RAID sets
Summary: dmraid fails to group certain Promise RAID sets
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification: Red Hat
Component: dmraid
Version: 4.0
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Heinz Mauelshagen
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2004-12-09 18:59 UTC by Heinz Mauelshagen
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:07 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: RHBA-2005-252
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-06-09 13:06:59 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2005:252 0 low SHIPPED_LIVE dmraid bug fix update 2005-06-09 04:00:00 UTC

Description Heinz Mauelshagen 2004-12-09 18:59:04 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de-AT; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030821

Description of problem:
The RAID set named grouping logic fails in certain cases
on Promise metadata. The name is created by using 1 out of 2
magic numbers and the worng one is picked in the failure case.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
dmraid-1.0.0.rc5f

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. dmraid -s

Actual Results:  Promise RAID set not recognized.

Expected Results:  Promise RAID set grouped and displayed correctly.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Heinz Mauelshagen 2005-01-25 15:14:38 UTC
Came up with a fix to the Promise grouping logic.
Will be in .rc6.



Comment 2 Tim Powers 2005-06-09 13:06:59 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2005-252.html



Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.